From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
Tommy
Intermediate Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 8:49 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by Tommy »

stsang wrote:Tommy, before making any conclusions, make sure that you are using the same string gauges for comparison.
Thanks. Yeah, I'll have to check what was on before the switch to Pyramids.
I do know that since the Pyramids the action has increased a bit. I replaced the saddle and shaved the new one down a bit.

This is the guitar in question -- an Epiphpne John Lennon EJ-160. The only reason I went with the Pyramids is to get that classic Beatle tone which the Pyramids do deliver. I like the Pyramids' sound but I didn't know they might be tugging at the neck more than other strings.

Image
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by Hotzenplotz »

How did You change the strings? I hope one after the other, keeping the other strings in tension.
User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by stsang »

Tommy wrote:I do know that since the Pyramids the action has increased a bit. I replaced the saddle and shaved the new one down a bit.
This is the guitar in question -- an Epiphpne John Lennon EJ-160. The only reason I went with the Pyramids is to get that classic Beatle tone which the Pyramids do deliver. I like the Pyramids' sound but I didn't know they might be tugging at the neck more than other strings.
Lovely guitar - be kind to her! :)
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
User avatar
DoubleThink
Junior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by DoubleThink »

One string replaced at a time. Yes, I agree, tension should be maintained. My understanding, though, of a potential result of removing all strings is an eventual possibility of a popped fretboard. Nothing like that is apparent. In fact, other than that wee separation at the neck joint, the guitar is near mint. Great player.
Rics ... and some other stuff....
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by Hotzenplotz »

Is it possible to see a close up picture of the cracked paint?

Btw. the dear Mr. Lennon is not a good example how to treat an instrument right. As I read in this forum a lot of his instruments had to suffer.
elisha wiesner
New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:37 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by elisha wiesner »

Hotzenplotz wrote:Is it possible to see a close up picture of the cracked paint?

Btw. the dear Mr. Lennon is not a good example how to treat an instrument right. As I read in this forum a lot of his instruments had to suffer.
It seems to me that a lot of people back in the day didn't treat their instruments as well as they should have.
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by Hotzenplotz »

elisha wiesner wrote:
It seems to me that a lot of people back in the day didn't treat their instruments as well as they should have.
And a lot of these instruments a are looking like - if they'd survived.


For a damage it was not necessary to stick it into the amp the way Pete Townshend did. Strings with high tension could do a destroying job, as well.
But before a close look at the fissure I do not want to bet on it.
User avatar
DoubleThink
Junior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by DoubleThink »

I'll post a photo of the separation ASAP, but will have to wait until the end of the week/weekend. Hopefully, I can get close enough with my camera to produce a worthwhile image.

After another long day at the office, it's nice to come home to a Rickenbacker or few....
Rics ... and some other stuff....
elisha wiesner
New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:37 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by elisha wiesner »

Hotzenplotz wrote:
elisha wiesner wrote:
It seems to me that a lot of people back in the day didn't treat their instruments as well as they should have.
And a lot of these instruments a are looking like - if they'd survived.
I'm actually amazed at how beat up some old guitars are. I play a lot of shows and don't always treat my guitars as well as maybe I should but I just can't fathom how it's even possible, outside of smashing it into an amp, to have a guitar in the kind of condition that I often see on ebay etc...
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by Hotzenplotz »

DoubleThink wrote:
After another long day at the office, it's nice to come home to a Rickenbacker or few....
So we had a very similar day, same happy end (with one Rickenbacker).

Enjoy!
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by Hotzenplotz »

elisha wiesner wrote: I'm actually amazed at how beat up some old guitars are. I play a lot of shows and don't always treat my guitars as well as maybe I should but I just can't fathom how it's even possible, outside of smashing it into an amp, to have a guitar in the kind of condition that I often see on ebay etc...
+1!!!
User avatar
DoubleThink
Junior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:37 pm

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by DoubleThink »

Here are phtos of what I've described in this thread. Apologies for the image quality.
Ric 370 back.jpg

In this image of the rear of the guitar, you will notice a lifting of the clear-coat along the binding, towards the left-hand side of the yellow oval. Also, there is a fine, dark line which extends along the white binding at the neck heel. This is the separation which most recently became apparent. Unfortunately, with my current photo gear, I cannot provide more detailed macro images ... unless I switch over to good, old-fashioned 35mm film....
Ric 370 side.jpg
In this image, from the perspective of the upper horn, you will notice the separation of the finish where the neck and body meet. There is no such separation at the neck/body joint by the lower horn.

None of this renders the guitar unplayable. In fact, for a player's guitar, the issue is relatively insignificant. The guitar continues to retain her tuning perfectly and she sings like a angel. It was a surprising and disturbing discovery, however.
Rics ... and some other stuff....
User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by stsang »

Stephan - thanks for posting those photos. Is the crack on both sides of the neck or just one?

Your post prompted to check my 2002 360/12 and to my surprise :shock: I see what appears to be a crack in the neck joint that has been filled and sealed. The crack is only on the High E side of the neck. Strangely, the guitar plays a little easier like this with the fingerboard raised a little on the high E side. I wonder if the previous owner did this on purpose? :shock:
Crack in neck joint filled and sealed?
Crack in neck joint filled and sealed?
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by ken_j »

stsang wrote: Crack in neck joint filled and sealed?
Looks like glue creped form the joint. Photos can be deceiving though.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
stsang
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 12:47 pm
Contact:

Re: From Pyramids to Thomastik-Infelds

Post by stsang »

ken_j wrote:
stsang wrote: Crack in neck joint filled and sealed?
Looks like glue creped form the joint. Photos can be deceiving though.
Ken,

Thanks much for taking a look. (BTW, I don't mean to hijack this thread, so if I should post elsewhere, let me know)
Here's another photo I took a while ago that also has some information:
Fretboard separation + glue in pickup well
Fretboard separation + glue in pickup well
The upper oval shows where it looks like the fretboard has separated a little from the body. The separation carries on a little further up the fretboard (another 5mm or so).
The lower oval shows excess glue in the neck pickup well.

It looks like something happened - either at the factory or after that. The guitar plays perfectly so I'm more curious than anything else.

All comments are welcome!
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”