Bridge for 3001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1481
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by iiipopes »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:why do people insist on putting fender style pickups in ricks ??? if you want more bottom buy a bottom end bass like a fender or get a bigger butt !!! btw, jeff, i'm gonna spank you for the j-pickup thought !
howzabout throwing those metal thunderbird pickups on a rick...that should do some structural damage.
I don't know... I went the other way and put a RIC HB-1 in my custom P-style bass, and it sounds great....
Attachments
BlueBass.JPG
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by jps »

That is a different take on fanned frets!
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

iiipopes wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:why do people insist on putting fender style pickups in ricks ??? if you want more bottom buy a bottom end bass like a fender or get a bigger butt !!! btw, jeff, i'm gonna spank you for the j-pickup thought !
howzabout throwing those metal thunderbird pickups on a rick...that should do some structural damage.
I don't know... I went the other way and put a RIC HB-1 in my custom P-style bass, and it sounds great....


OH, YEAH ??? well...i went the other way too... back in '79...when i built a p-bass body in school with a set fender neck...and installed the higain from MJ-4844 for more top end...so ...there !!! :roll: :lol:

download/file.php?id=22056&mode=view
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by jps »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:
iiipopes wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:why do people insist on putting fender style pickups in ricks ??? if you want more bottom buy a bottom end bass like a fender or get a bigger butt !!! btw, jeff, i'm gonna spank you for the j-pickup thought !
howzabout throwing those metal thunderbird pickups on a rick...that should do some structural damage.
I don't know... I went the other way and put a RIC HB-1 in my custom P-style bass, and it sounds great....


OH, YEAH ??? well...i went the other way too... back in '79...when i built a p-bass body in school with a set fender neck...and installed the higain from MJ-4844 for more top end...so ...there !!! :roll: :lol:

download/file.php?id=22056&mode=view
I used to have a '72 Jazz Bass (that a friend of mine has, now) that I replaced the middle (neck) pickup with a hi-gain pickup; I, also, (with a LOT of trouble) sanded the Sunburst finish off and oiled the body, and put a Schaller roller bridge on it. Sounds great. My friend currently has a fretless neck on the bass.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by cassius987 »

jps wrote:That is a different take on fanned frets!
Having owned a Dingwall for a spell, I actually think I prefer Scott's bass.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by jps »

Having never played a fanned fret instrument, either would be cool for me to check out. 8)

The first time I learned of the Novax system was on the Fleishman Scroll bass.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by cassius987 »

It's a really neat idea and the Dingwall system is great, but I think Scott's fretboard design (which if I recall he came up with and instructed Novax on personally) feels more practical especially in the high register. On the other hand the Dingwall system feels extra comfy down by the nut on the low strings.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by johnallg »

Back to the OP's question about bridges, from the pictures of your bass, it looks like you could remove the BAII, pull out the wood plugs in the original routes, and put in a RIC tailpiece to restore it to original. They are sold on the RIC Boutique at the corporate site.

Tailpiece = http://boutique.rickenbacker.com/TAILPI ... p_554.html
Bridge = http://boutique.rickenbacker.com/BRIDGE ... p_740.html

If you decide to go with the Hipshot one, leave the wood in the rout and put it on.

And welcome to the forum!
User avatar
BobHyde
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:13 pm

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by BobHyde »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:why do people insist on putting fender style pickups in ricks ??? if you want more bottom buy a bottom end bass like a fender or get a bigger butt !!! btw, jeff, i'm gonna spank you for the j-pickup thought !

howzabout throwing those metal thunderbird pickups on a rick...that should do some structural damage.
It's funny because I've been amazed at the low end in my '72. Since I've spent the last 15 years playing mainly Fenders, I expected the tone to be thin. It's not!
User avatar
bluegrassmoker
New member
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 1:02 pm
Contact:

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by bluegrassmoker »

nice pics
http://www.sundlofengineering.com

Modifications, Restorations, Innovations and one of a kind creations...

http://www.myspace.com/patrickgrigsbysundlof
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Bridge for 3001

Post by aceonbass »

Factory RIC bass tailpieces are so expensive that I no longer buy new ones. Instead I find them on Ebay pretty reasonably. The chrome can be questionable, but considering the extensive mods I perform on them, it doesn't matter since they will be re-plated. RIC used to charge $75.00 before the Hipshot part came out. JH specifically mentioned that as the reason for raising the price.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”