There have been a couple of neck thru '72's IIRC.JakeK wrote:Another way to tell:
4001S post-71: set neck
4003S: neck-through
calling expert on S basses
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: calling expert on S basses
-
MaplegloMatt
- Junior Member
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:28 pm
Re: calling expert on S basses
If this beautiful example of a 4003s can't spark enough interest in re-introducing this model, then I fear all may be lost... Well, OK, it's not quite that serious of a situation, but at least we can dream. 
Re: calling expert on S basses
Looks great! Should have a nice neck too.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: calling expert on S basses
Did somebody say S bass?
She's purdy!

She's purdy!
+1teeder wrote:Looks great! Should have a nice neck too.
-
just_bassics
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 1244
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:12 am
- BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
- Professional Player
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm
Re: calling expert on S basses
here's one '72 s model from an old catalogue...wints wrote:There have been a couple of neck thru '72's IIRC.JakeK wrote:Another way to tell:
4001S post-71: set neck
4003S: neck-through
Re: calling expert on S basses
The S in the ad has the skunk stripe through the body (neck-thru) but also walnut wings. Interesting.
Re: calling expert on S basses
Yeah, I noticed that too, Paul. Must be nice to have lots of play money like those guys and be able to buy whatever you want, although I can't complain re: my mini collection of four Rics (two "S" models from 1982 and a 2030 included). I remember reading about a "bass in the pool" story involving a Ric owned by Anthony (4005?), but that it wasn't repairable. I'm sure that it would be searchable on here.bassduke49 wrote:pbert wrote:Ok thanks,
but I have seen in the galery that some 4001s form the early 90's have been listed:
http://www.rickresource.com/register/ga ... 93&month=0
These bass have no skunk stripe, doe it means thaey are actually 4003s?
it is so confusing, ...
Yes, should be listed as 4003S. This is one example of a weakness in the Register that I hope to be able to help correct soon. Sometimes, the owner, or the spotter of one of the "collected information" entries, just doesn't know what he has or has seen.
It's really true that there are loads of people out there that still think every Rick bass is a 4001. Case in point: The latest issue of Vintage Guitar highlights Michael Anthony's collection. They got the designations right on the hollow-body 4005's, including rare six- and eight-stringers, but the very early single-pickup Rick is described as "Anthony got this '50s Rickenbacker 4001 . . . and was told it was the third 4001 built." It's obviously an old-style Natural 4000 minus the sliding mute.
"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect." Vince Lombardi
