Page 2 of 2
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:40 pm
by sloop_john_b
I like to know what kind of fretless he uses on "Ghosts", and if he had recorded any fretless tracks previously.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:42 pm
by studiotwosession
Did he enjoy producing the Vapors and how did that come about.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:12 pm
by fireglo67
PM sent!
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 2:31 pm
by wim
fireglo67 wrote:PM sent!
now you got me curious
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:13 pm
by fireglo67
wim wrote:fireglo67 wrote:PM sent!
now you got me curious
Top secret mate. All will be revealed in the coming months.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:02 am
by Chris P
I got the PM... very inappropriate! This is a bass forum!!!! Please don't do that again

Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:52 pm
by vax2002
He told me, it was because the Rickenbacker did not have enough bass end live with the Amplifiers at that time and when he became accustomed with the precision he was too settled to go back.
We are pre-4003 and the 4001 were a bit low on sound filling bass, amps were not that clever and there was only so much bass end you could get.
He still owns Ricks.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:09 pm
by sloop_john_b
vax2002 wrote:He told me, it was because the Rickenbacker did not have enough bass end live with the Amplifiers at that time and when he became accustomed with the precision he was too settled to go back.
We are pre-4003 and the 4001 were a bit low on sound filling bass, amps were not that clever and there was only so much bass end you could get.
He still owns Ricks.
Also, 4001 basses had this awful capacitor that cut out bass from the bridge pickup.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:46 am
by vax2002
The bass filter caps were required in those days, with a Rick 4003 when you roll up the tone the bass stays on, unlike precisions that roll it off.
Wind back 40+ years and you had a bass that made very short work of speakers and amps in those days, they had to filter it out to lose the reputation that Ricks blew your amp, so in went a bass filter .
In the 80's amps and speaker technology began to catch up and cap should have gone then but hung around, so you had other basses that produced more bass.
This sent Ricks in to a a bit of a no mans land until the second edition of the 4003 hit the shops.
No bass has bottom end like a 4003 other than active basses and none certainly as clear with open tone pots.
Think bruce just needed a deeper more rounded sound live as we hear the Ricks on many late recordings, also the precisions needed less maintenance on the necks with roundwounds, had the 4003 been out, he may well have switched back.
If they had cut the cap sooner, things might have been different.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:45 pm
by Oz_Greg
.
..........with a Rick 4003 when you roll up the tone the bass stays on, unlike precisions that roll it off.
Interesting. I've never noticed it, or indeed heard
of it before.
Now I'm going to have to get my Precision out and see if I can hear it!
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:43 pm
by Oz_Greg
.
..........with a Rick 4003 when you roll up the tone the bass stays on, unlike precisions that roll it off.
Interesting. I've never noticed it, or indeed heard of it before.
Now I'm going to have to get my Precision out and see if I can hear it!
Wow, you're right!
I did a back-to-back against my 4001 and I can definitely hear a drop in lower frequencies when I dial the tone up on the Precision.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Fri Apr 26, 2013 4:51 am
by vax2002
It is one of the best characteristics of Rickenbackers, you get to keep the bottom end with the tone clean.
However in the old days the sub frequencies destroyed bass cabs like no tommorow so in went a cap to protect the inferior amplifiers.
The design of the 4001 was too perfect for its time and had to be castrated until amps and cabs caught up.
Foxy likes his precisions now, but the tone of his Rick recordings is the thing of legends.
Just wish he would record with a Rick again, as ricks have a fan club who would buy his stuff just to hear the bass.
When you use a precision, it's just a bass that sounds like other basses and nobody really cares what you played.
Put a Rick on and up go the ears of all bass players.
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 5:43 am
by Oz_Greg
.
..........with a Rick 4003 when you roll up the tone the bass stays on, unlike precisions that roll it off.
(Apologies for hijacking the thread.)
What's the difference in the wiring that causes this?
I'm guessing the location of the tone capacitor somehow?
.... ulterior motive: I'd like to mod my P-Bass if I can so the bass stays on when I roll the tone up!
Re: Bruce Foxton
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 6:21 am
by wim
/Marc, I 'm not convinced by your theory!
The caps were placed on the pu's that actually are quite similar to other basses pu's.
The neck pu, which delivers that deep ground tone was left 'unharmed' and could still have blown a speaker.