Page 2 of 22

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:05 am
by teeder
I thought the wood received a coat of sealer at the factory when it went in for the pre-Wings Over America tune-up?

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 9:27 am
by ram
don't forget the missing part of the pickgaurd down by the knobs.... progress pictures please!

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:07 am
by congerz83
bugman wrote:I had a C64S years ago and am saving to get one again but while I loved the bass, I also wished it was more correct in shape,contour, and finish. I am going to watch this thread and will be interested in how close you get it to look like the present day McCartney RIC. Did you have to send the RIC away or is he located close to you?
Not far at all! Mr. Mark Walker lives about 40 minutes from me in NY's best borough... BROOKLYN!

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:08 am
by congerz83
aceonbass wrote:One detail impossible to replicate will be the end of the fretboard's location relative to the upper and lower cutaways. RIC appears to have lengthened and moved the neck blank further forward to allow greater access to the higher frets. Since the scale length hasn't changed, this means the tailpiece is also slightly further forward. The pickguard, still resting up against the end of the fretboard, is now much closer to the cutaways. I personally don't care for the way this looks. As an aside, this would have been a good time to add a 21st fret, since the guard would have moved back closer to it's original position relative to the cutaways.
Very funny you mentioned that... I noticed that myself the other day...

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 am
by congerz83
For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:59 am
by ilan
If they fit the "long, shiny kind" description, you're safe.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:05 am
by johnhall
teeder wrote:I thought the wood received a coat of sealer at the factory when it went in for the pre-Wings Over America tune-up?
It did but there wasn't much left of it the last time I saw it.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:20 pm
by iamthebassman
ram wrote:don't forget the missing part of the pickgaurd down by the knobs.... progress pictures please!
I thought that broken pickguard was replaced years ago.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:23 pm
by deaconblues
I think this is a great project. Good luck!

It's funny, a member here was once tarred and feathered for questioning why the shape of the c64 was so different from the original. My, how times have changed...

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:27 pm
by iamthebassman
congerz83 wrote:For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?
I know you're not asking me but I'll tell ya anyway, I used Pyramids for a few years on my Hofner and they were OK, tried them on my 4001S and was not happy, too dull and floppy.
For several years now I've used LaBellas on the Hofner and GHS Precision Flatwounds on the 4001S.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:50 pm
by congerz83
iamthebassman wrote:
ram wrote:don't forget the missing part of the pickgaurd down by the knobs.... progress pictures please!
I thought that broken pickguard was replaced years ago.
From what I understand, you're correct... Perhaps during the Pre-WOA RIC "tune-up"

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:53 pm
by congerz83
deaconblues wrote:I think this is a great project. Good luck!

It's funny, a member here was once tarred and feathered for questioning why the shape of the c64 was so different from the original. My, how times have changed...
I was very careful how I worded the beginning of this thread for the same reason. Some people shiver at what sounds like critism of the company, others get angry.

Let the record show that I mean NO disrespect to anyone with this project. It's something I've wanted to do for years.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:57 pm
by congerz83
iamthebassman wrote:
congerz83 wrote:For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?
I know you're not asking me but I'll tell ya anyway, I used Pyramids for a few years on my Hofner and they were OK, tried them on my 4001S and was not happy, too dull and floppy.
For several years now I've used LaBellas on the Hofner and GHS Precision Flatwounds on the 4001S.
Unreal! After talking about them for YEARS, finally someone else admits to using the GHS Precision Flats... Been using them from the beginning. I want to try something with lower string tension though. The GHS's have created a "just enough to be annoying" tail-lift on my C64. I understand though that my C64S has a 5-screw bridge, so THAT bass won't be an issue... Just want to try something different.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:03 pm
by sloop_john_b
I too like the GHS Precision Flats!

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:28 pm
by eddied
Thought I'd show eveyone my pride and joy. It is an actual picture taken by me @ The Boston Garden during the Wings Across America Tour. A really nice stage roadie allowed me to get up close and take a picture of the HOLY GRAIL Paul's 4001S. I will never forget the night. Check it out.
Boston garden 76.jpg