Page 2 of 2
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:09 pm
by Ashgray
Tramper Al wrote:Bonus points if you can tell me which bass George is playing!
Bass? Looks like a Fender Tele to me!
Ash
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:30 pm
by thymecube
Nice try.... George is playing his rosewood Tele. Just sounds like a bass.
Where can I collect my bonus points?
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:35 pm
by Tramper Al
Hah, you guys are all right!
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:23 pm
by Keef
Looks like George is playing his rosewood tele, but the resolution is pretty bad so I could be wrong.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 4:50 pm
by artisan4
FG absolutely, Paul mucked up the bass when he painted it and took the finish off.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 5:10 pm
by Tramper Al
artisan4 wrote:FG absolutely, Paul mucked up the bass when he painted it and took the finish off.
Perhaps, but he was a Beatle when he did so.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:52 pm
by teeder
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:18 pm
by Clifton
teeder wrote:family 712.jpg
family 715.jpg
family 677.jpg
82201748.jpg
allguitars.jpg
family 693.jpg
I'll order one of each, please!
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 8:21 pm
by Clifton
Hmm, wonder why it wouldn't show the photos above. Anyway, what a treat to see all the Beatles' gear. The bottom photo looks like the Shea Stadium-era instrument lineup.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:34 am
by iamthebassman
deaconblues wrote:
Also, the bass horn was silver, not blue. I'm really not sure why all the people who re-create this bass paint the horn blue.
Because they are referencing photos of my bass, not Paul's. I painted the upper horn on my bass teal 15+ years ago, just to be a bit different(and I didn't have any silver paint around), and there are a LOT more clear pics of my bass on the internet than there are of Paul's. Those Chinese knock-offs are clearly copying my bass.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2014 1:30 pm
by simer4001
From a Beatles standpoint, there are more photo's of the bass in its MMT variation than in FG or MG that I can see.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:25 am
by antipodean
simer4001 wrote:From a Beatles standpoint, there are more photo's of the bass in its MMT variation than in FG or MG that I can see.
Agree 100%. The MG variation probably has more exposure from Paul's post-Beatles career. The original FG finish was probably around for longer than the MMT variation but is nowhere near as well documented.
Re: 4001c64 FG or MG? - from a Beatles standpoint
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 11:52 am
by simer4001
The FG was from 64-66. The MMT was from 67-69. So they were pretty close in duration.