Page 2 of 2

Re: Neck angle on 4001 and string tension

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:09 pm
by cassius987
antonius wrote:(the action at the 20th fret is only fractionally higher than at the 12th fret and I've still got room to lower the bridge a bit if I needed to)
Technically this is how it's supposed to be so your setup is probably perfecto right now. You want there to be a hair of that "fallaway" in the upper register because the string excursion increases the closer you get to the end of the neck.

Re: Neck angle on 4001 and string tension

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:24 pm
by antonius
cassius987 wrote:
antonius wrote:(the action at the 20th fret is only fractionally higher than at the 12th fret and I've still got room to lower the bridge a bit if I needed to)
Technically this is how it's supposed to be so your setup is probably perfecto right now. You want there to be a hair of that "fallaway" in the upper register because the string excursion increases the closer you get to the end of the neck.
Indeed. That's why I'm hoping the neck/body junction remains stable, which it probably will... :)

Re: Neck angle on 4001 and string tension

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 12:32 am
by coolingitdown
cassius987 wrote:
antonius wrote:(the action at the 20th fret is only fractionally higher than at the 12th fret and I've still got room to lower the bridge a bit if I needed to)
Technically this is how it's supposed to be so your setup is probably perfecto right now. You want there to be a hair of that "fallaway" in the upper register because the string excursion increases the closer you get to the end of the neck.
+1

Re: Neck angle on 4001 and string tension

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:53 pm
by johnallg
antonius wrote:Yes my bass has the neck pickup at the 1" position, but the rout looks like it is bigger than it needs to be and it could almost accommodate the pickup at the 1/2" position.
Probably is. 1975 was a transition year for 1/2" to 1" neck position.