77 Fireglo 4001S on Ebay

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

gregson1
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 136
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2001 7:14 pm

Post by gregson1 »

I had an '82 set neck 4001S. It was over a pound lighter in weight compared to a neck through '97 4003 I have, which was nice. I used it on a clean channel through an Aguilar DB659 tube preamp for blues. It was nothing special in either tone or construction. As far as Ricks go, for me, it's got to be neckthrough.

I have a Rickenbacker bass humbucker that I put in that bass in the treble position for a short while before I sold it. I remember that it both thickened (muddied?) and warmed up the tone quite a bit--not to mention a boost in output. But in the end, it felt a little like putting a horseshoe pickup into a P-bass.
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

Or like putting a Jazz Bass pickup in a 4003s5? Image
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

hey ... that combo kicks butt ... it reduces hum and adds bite ...

Image
rictified
Senior Member
Posts: 8040
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 5:00 am

Post by rictified »

Yeah, but you have to eliminate one of the most important parts of a Ric bass to put it in there... the mute.
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

gee what would I do without a mechanical mute ... gee ... uhhh ... well ... I guess I'll play bass ...

But with 3 pickups I could wire is tri-o-sound send each of the 3 pickups to a seperate amp ...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”