Page 2 of 4
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:31 am
by bottom4
Hey Joey! How is the responsiveness of the B string on that bad boy?
Dane. I have two 4004 Cii and natural and a trans red. There really isn’t any difference between the two and I most likely won’t do anything to make them different. I love the RIC string on these basses so I’ll probably always go with RIC strings.
The 4004Cii IMO is the best bass RIC produces today!
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 5:52 am
by jwr2
I have 9 5 string basses ... and I have owned like 10 others ... so one of the major factors in having a tight responsive B string is getting the right strings ... there are several string makers who make really good E A D G strings but their B string is not so good ... I was convinced that one of my basses just wouldn't make a good 5 string bass ... until I put a different brand of strings on ...
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 5:54 am
by rickenbrother
Dane, I had planned on having the two 4004Cii5 basses setup differently from each other. I think to start out, one will have flats, the other roundwounds. I have not had a bass strung with flatwound strings for over 22 years. One of them might even become seriously modded, like into a fretless, or possibly a 10 string if think I can arrange all the tuners on the head well enough.
Andy, your 4004 basses are gorgeous. The 4004Cii5 comes with a .115 B string. Ive never heard a B string that skinny sound so good. The B sring on this bass is much better than most of the 5 string basses out there with a 34" or 35" scale neck. Probably in a month or so I will put new strings on it with a .130 gauged B, it should sound even tighter. The mass of the neck with the neck thru design makes the B string a great one. I'd put the B string right up there with my StingRay5's and they are strung with .130 B strings.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:40 am
by jnbass
Andy-
I like your taste in colours...
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:33 am
by jwr2
I have used several sets of bass strings that had a low B of .130 ... they all were sub standard ... I find .125 is better ... when the b gets too fat it loses definition ... when the other strings get too skinny then they loose their low end ...
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:10 pm
by bottom4
They are good choices aren’t they! And don’t you have one of these Jared?
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 2:40 pm
by beatlefan
Uh-oh! Andy has called upon the darkness of Shadow-dom......
Hey, with it being halloween....
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:12 pm
by jnbass
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:19 pm
by jps
It's Spot!!!
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 12:52 am
by cheyenne
Haaaaaaaaaaaaa! I just love this place
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 2:12 am
by paulcreedy
I want a 4 string version of that 8 string
It'd go perfectly with my 330
Paul
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:28 am
by bottom4
How about a 5 string!?
Hey Jared is that a Black Lab Special. Mine came without dot markers hahaha!
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:58 am
by paulcreedy
a 5 string would be good too
(another one to add to the want list, *sigh* )
Paul
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:10 am
by paulcreedy
now look what you've done - I'm flogging off loads of gear now so as to have a 5 string fund for when one becomes available
Paul
p.s. although I might just fit heavier strings to a Std and tune it BEAD .... too many choices make my head spin
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:05 am
by incubus2432
I had a 4003s5 previously and loved the tone and basic feel but the tight string spacing made it unusable for me so I sold it. I then tuned one of my 4003's BEAD (without filing the nut) and found it to be a much better solution for me. I played it like that for about a year and just recently filed the nut properly and it is even better. I would definitely recommend just stringing it first which will give you a good idea if you like it (action a little high at the first few frets but not a big deal). That way if it doesn't work out there is no harm done.
