Page 20 of 22

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 12:43 pm
by Lefty4003S8
s4001 wrote:FIFY :lol:


Now THAT'S more like it!!!! :lol: :lol: Thanks!!!!

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:26 pm
by walker
Thanks, guys. I'm pretty happy with how it turned out, too.

Jeff - is that your Jetglo-to-Walnutglo refin? That's a nice healthy gap it has between the neck pickup cavity and the edge of the fretboard.

You know, the more I'm looking at the slight variation in the two pickguards, I'm thinking that just shifting Rick's down about ⅛" and back towards the tailpiece by about 1/16th-to-3/32nds" would set it at about the same relation to the HS pickup and neck as Paul's. That would tighten the gap at the front of the HS surround, and create the gap below the surround and at the end of the fretboard. I think it would work to just make a new PG using Rick's "edited version" as the template and just shift the screw holes over. hmmm.... will confer with the owner.
walker wrote:
Image

Image

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 2:33 pm
by walker
(Woops! There you go:)

Image

Image

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:28 pm
by deaconblues
walker wrote:Interesting comparison, Dan. Even that RM looks like it has the bottom wing cut just a little deeper than McCartney's. But it's not like RIC didn't have a chance to use his bass as a template.
Well I'm not sure what Rickenbacker used as a template for the c64s -- or if they used one at all. The overall shape looks awfully close to the standard 4003 in the second photo.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:48 pm
by congerz83
I'll share the most important picture I've had time to take...

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:24 pm
by walker
Heh heh! I knew the shoes wouldn't last long...

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:47 am
by heinpete
...is the displacement of the bridge on the lower pic on purpose? :shock:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:48 am
by walker
Not sure. You'd have to ask Paul.

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:34 pm
by heinpete
...Paul B.? :roll:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:38 pm
by teeder
Probably to get the E & A to intonate!

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 4:29 pm
by eddied
For fun I thought I'd post an authenitc picture of the 4001S that I personally took at the old Boston Garden during the Wings Across America Tour. A super nice roadie acrtually let me get up close to take this and it is a precious treasure for me.
Boston garden 76.jpg

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:37 am
by bigbajo60
eddied wrote:For fun I thought I'd post an authenitc picture of the 4001S that I personally took at the old Boston Garden during the Wings Across America Tour. A super nice roadie acrtually let me get up close to take this and it is a precious treasure for me.
Boston garden 76.jpg
Is that link working for anyone?

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:44 am
by JakeK
bigbajo60 wrote:Is that link working for anyone?
No

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:01 am
by jps
It's not a link nor attachment, just some text. Eddied needs to properly attach that image. :wink:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:43 am
by edski
teeder wrote:Probably to get the E & A to intonate!
:lol: