Page 3 of 5

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:58 am
by henny
2mm of plastic causes a thread 30 posts and 2 pages long. Crikey.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:19 am
by rickinroma
yes, mark, we all need some psichotherapy :-)

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 5:48 am
by kcole4001
We just need to play some more!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:22 am
by lowendbob
Well now that you pointed that out Bob, I'm appalled! Image

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 am
by lars
In industrial design, there's always a trade off between functions and aestethics. But in this case, why change a design that was both beautyful and functional?

Now some playing, then off to the shrink :-)

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:28 am
by henny
But in this case, why change a design that was both beautyful and functional?


lol...

We're talking about the curve of a piece of perspex.... 4003s haven't suddenly gone headless or anything, have they?

I am surprised it's bothered you all so much.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:40 am
by lars
As I said Henny: I'm off to the shrink!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:17 am
by ken_swearingen
So I guess we have another question to ask when buying a new 4003.

"Does it have the impregnated pickguard"

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:22 am
by ricosound
This is what happens when a design goes virtually unchanged for 40 years.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:27 am
by wim
Imagine what would happen if they took 2mm off the headstock..

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:44 am
by johnashfield
Well, in my case I never bought a 4003 for a long time because of the small headstock. I just bought a 4001cs, and later a 4004c.

Once the headstock got bigger, I just had a new pickguard made, and simple as that no hassle.

Some people notice this stuff, some don't. It is a super small detail. But, for me the Rickenbacker bass is so interesting a design, that a few extra mm of plastic look odd. Some people may love it, vive la difference, or something.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:21 am
by henny
Well, in my case I never bought a 4003 for a long time because of the small headstock.


Seriously?! Crikey... what a shame.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:47 am
by henry5
Got to say the big horns put me off later 70s and 80s 4001/4003s nowadays....I tend to think if they could just get the headstock right on the current 4003 the shape would be pretty near bang on for my taste. Then all they need to do is fit a plexi trc, a 1/2 inch toaster, and some full width inlays.....oh, and sort out that pickguard, LOL!!

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:53 am
by ken_swearingen
The headstock is perfect on the new 4003 matches the body....They went back to the longer headstock of the sixty's and they even incorporate wings, great design.

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 11:09 am
by jwr2
to be truthful the change in the pickguard means nothing to me except I like the fact that they lined up the knobs again like it was on my '68 ...