Page 3 of 3

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:10 am
by wints
Dave may well be right.

I have seen that in the UK, the promised big $$$ sales doesn't usually happen. With no exchange rate to work with (more against in this case with GBP!) people are nearly always looking for bargains there and it is a tough market to get maximum $$$...IMO.

And...as it has been stated before, it is a bass with limited appeal. It always has been, hence no chance of a reissue.

The winner may well come from this forum as this is where the largest group of people who want this bass are.

Saying that, the 68 I played had a wonderful neck profile and a real nice warm tone. It was wearing rounds and sounded quite versatile.
They are not for everyone, but if you want an hollow bodied bass you should get a 4005, and if you want a 4005, you should get this one...

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 3:00 pm
by jps
I have Chromes on mine now primarily to not wear the frets down any further, but I used to always use XLs which sounded awesome.

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 8:48 am
by philipharris
hmmm, think I'll stick with my EB2s for that acoustic sound then - not that I ever find a place for it these days. nice bass though, that 4005.

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:14 am
by 8mileshigh
I was thinking of bidding - but I just don't feel too good about bidding against newly registered, zero feedbackers. Didn't that happen on the first auction? Where are those guys now? Sorry for being so suspicious.

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:21 am
by 8mileshigh
I think if Kelly's really serious about selling this, he needs to cancel those zero feedback bids? It's going to put off serious bidders. Sorry Kelly.

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 2:39 am
by marc61
I agree Graham. It's kinda ironic. I think when he first listed the bass, the minimum bid was 3500 pounds, right where the bid stands today.

If he's concerned about getting paid and/or the bids are legit, he should clean it up.

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:34 am
by bob_atherton
FWIW the bidding has just reached the point that was my max. Oh well.... my fault for being so tight!

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:44 am
by 8mileshigh
Well it's sold then?? So we won't see it re-listed then?? mmmmmmmm........

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 3:44 pm
by marc61
I doubt that bidder is for real. Funny, I would have paid $7500 for it originally, but it wasn't good enough for him. Sometimes money is lost by indecision rather than the wrong decision.

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:13 pm
by marty
Uhmm...

Here's a quote from Kelly posting on the Ric forum regarding the sale on ebay:

"£4251 and I've been stiffed (high bidder says he/she won't pay and now won't answer my e-mails) As my wife says maybe I'm just supposed to keep it. Pretty frustrating to say the least.."

"Got one e-mail saying they won't pay, then no answers to my e-mails after that. Probably gonna re-list. This time no zero feedbackers allowed."

Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:45 pm
by 8mileshigh
4th time lucky then? I think from the last 3 attempts to sell it, the current value is somewhere around £3,500. All Kelly needs to do now is accept that, when he re-lists. Each re-listing is just devaluing a great bass, IMHO. Good luck Kelly.