Page 3 of 4

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:10 am
by deeper
Wow! Great to have a Chris' friend among us!

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:17 am
by ken_swearingen
Seth,owns the potato head 8 string 4001 of Squires.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:19 am
by rickaddict
Ooooo.....Potato head!

Me likey!

I want the other one!

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:41 am
by jnbass
Image
4005/8
Image

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:55 am
by levykev
hey Seth-

how about getting Chris onto the forum to answer all those questions?

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:01 pm
by kbhag
"all 4001 basses have no tilt in the headstock ... starting in 1980 the 4003 got a tilt ... another improvement ..."

No Jeff, my '75 has a rearward tilt, but '60's basses come off straight, unless they have been worked on/modified. I appears in that Vid that the headstock on THIS particular instrument tilts back. Evidence of repair/upgrade? I don't know only an observation. (I've wondered if at the time the headstock repair was done if someone put a bit of a back-angle to get better string tension across the nut.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:06 pm
by kcole4001
So that's a potato head! Odd looking bit, that.

Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:19 pm
by ilan
Hideous IMHO.

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 5:14 am
by j_gary
Yikes! What is the story on the potato head. I'm thinking there is a Greatful Dead party bar fairly close to the Rick factory. Occasionally they must offer some great lunch specials.

Cool photo's Jared, thanks!

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:59 am
by jnbass
another shot...
Image

Darth Tater

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:34 am
by j_gary
Jared, you're killing me. The whole house heard me fall outta my chair. How come he/she/it ain't got pants on? This is a family operation.

Later Tater

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:42 pm
by jnbass
he only has a spud...

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:21 pm
by scott_s
Wow, that Beggs article is riddled with spelling errors... What would FLEE, RICKENBAKER, DYLON, or MUT LANG say if they read this? Image

Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 4:46 pm
by j_gary
Jared, yea I know how he feels.

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:28 am
by nbvbn
Squire told me when Rickenbacker first made his 8 string the headstock was set up with all full size bass tuners. Chris explained tuning was awkward and there was not enough space between tuning pegs. Rickenbacker re-fit the bass with smaller sized tuners for the 4-octave strings. Only problem was the shape of the headstock did not work for one of the octave strings tuner . The shaft of the tuner was not long enough to clear the headstock. Rickenbacker had to scallop a cutout for the tuner so the tuner could be turned. All other 8 string 4001 bodied Rickenbacker basses that were made had a correctly shaped headstock that worked with the smaller octave tuners. On Chris’s bass the shape of the headstock is a little different than the photo on this thread. Plus the fact the bass has yellowed a ton. The headstock cutout gives the potato (as you guys call it) an even weirder shape.