Page 3 of 5

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:33 am
by leftybass
Paul, even though I own it I had to hijack that pic from Bjorn's site, LOL...Here's another with a distant cousin.

Image

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:41 am
by leftybass
TRC from my MG '72 LH...

Image

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:14 pm
by brammy
To me that looks weird... Ric TRC's look best when curving downward, not upward, IMHO.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:35 pm
by grinch
Yeah, I agree.

"A '64 360/12 prototype. :-)"

Thank GOD they thought of the ingenious 12-string design that they did. That 6 + 6 design is horrible! I have a Gibson 12 string that is the same way.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:55 pm
by jwilli
Nick, I agree but a few of us think that it is an important historical prototype. When it came up on Ebay, 99.9% of the Rick experts thought it was bogus. Rickenbacker shipping docs proved that it was the real deal. Even John Hall was surprised.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 3:14 pm
by grinch
I would've thought it was a fake too...the machine poles aren't even evenly spaced!

Nonetheless, you are right. A very important part of 12-string guitar history.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 5:04 pm
by jps
If you were at MARF last November, they were there for all to see and play. Image

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:49 pm
by brammy
>>Thank GOD they thought of the ingenious 12-string design that they did.

yup, you got that right... pure genius.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:57 pm
by brammy
4001C64... from the current Rickenbacker web site... the TRC just doesn't look right.
Image

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:05 pm
by brammy
Image
On this Carl Wilson 360-12, I think that the extra contour cut above the "..kenback.." letters ruins the whole look. It would be far better to redesign the TRC so that it maintains the traditional single-curve shape, even if that means making it significantly smaller or skinnier.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:07 pm
by grinch
Here is a higher resolution version of that pic above. I agree, it does look a little awkward, but RIC had no choice. That's a righty neck on a lefty body.

Image

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 7:21 pm
by jingle_jangle
Kent, most Rick 12's have that oddly-shaped TRC, to clear the string slots.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:16 pm
by leftybass
You guys need to understand why they made the C64 that way, it is how McCartney's bass is made. Of course, if it was just your usual run-of-the-mill righty 4001-S, the head stock would look like all the others. That type of peghead shape looks normal to me because I'm left-handed, and don't forget they made leftys that way for at least 24 years. Lefty Hofner necks are upside down, too.

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:37 pm
by rick36
Here are the '63 360/12 and '65 360/12 similar to the George Harrison models. Also the latest 360/12C63 and the 2000 360/12 CW. The '63's appear to be the most unusual of all the 360/12 TRC's...
ImageImageImageImage

Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2006 9:43 pm
by jingle_jangle
As I said...