Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:05 pm
by rich
I have one, Scott!
Enjoy...Rich



Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:07 pm
by jps
"I wish Rick would just do a RM1999.....
Sigh...."
Like this?

Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:17 pm
by rich
I don't have a strong feeling about the headstock either way myself. I just wanted a Macca spec bass and that is what I got. If I couldn't get a C64, I would have wanted a V63 because I prefer the "dot" position markers. I just wish Rick would make the lefty 4003's with the "shark fin" position markers reversed so they would be correct for a lefty.
Rich
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:09 pm
by jnbass
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 10:04 pm
by sloop_john_b
I agree Rich. I didn't have any feelings about the headstock until I heard so many opinions here against it. I still don't care much, though I suppose a "normal" one would be cool. I just like having a bass like Paul's, which is why I bought it in the first place.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 6:13 am
by rickfan63
I have a C64FG too. I like the reversed headstock on it. It looks cool to me, I also have a V63MG so I can go either way; they both look fine to me.
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 6:58 am
by j_gary
Jared, man you are killing me!
I'm gonna have to install a seat belt on my chair before I see any more of your posts!
BTW, is that pot a reissue?
Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:50 am
by s4001
Thanks Rich. I think that's the only one I've seen.