Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:29 am
Dear John Hall,
Thank you very much for your reply (by personal email), and my sincere apologies for annoying you with my last petulant postings.
I had previously emailed you about this issue on the 11th June and 20th June and having received no reply I posted here in a fit of pique. It was very rude of me, and churlish given the generous nature of your original offer. You are no doubt a very busy man. I apologise and will follow up every posting and make it clear that I was in the wrong and that my bad manners should not reflect badly on you or on Rickenbacker.
Sincerely, Lee Kear
Thank you very much for your reply (by personal email), and my sincere apologies for annoying you with my last petulant postings.
I had previously emailed you about this issue on the 11th June and 20th June and having received no reply I posted here in a fit of pique. It was very rude of me, and churlish given the generous nature of your original offer. You are no doubt a very busy man. I apologise and will follow up every posting and make it clear that I was in the wrong and that my bad manners should not reflect badly on you or on Rickenbacker.
Sincerely, Lee Kear