Page 3 of 3
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 6:11 pm
by charlyg
Please notice the post number of my last post(above)
Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:10 am
by jdogric12
Cool, Charly. And it was about trombone! How funny.
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:42 am
by jdogric12
Um, thanks Bryan. May I ask what is up with that link?
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:52 am
by sowhat
Huh. Good question, Jason. I've just asked the same one in another thread. S-p-a-you-know-the-last-letter?..
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:53 am
by jdogric12
Okay, Bryan, I've just reviewed the 6 posts you've placed on this forum. I have to say I am a little suspicious. 5 of your 6 posts have offered little actual content except what appears to be a link to information on gambling. I might have let it go since Peter will catch it anyway, but you're on my turf now. At least, my section of Peter's turf! We talk musicianship here, not casinos. Unless it's an Epiphone Casino!
So forgive me if my assessment is flawed, in which case I offer my apologies, but I'll bet dollars to donuts this is some kind of "intelligent spamming," and you will notice we don't dig that type of thing, man. Not our bag.
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 3:53 am
by jdogric12
Glad to see you're on it too, Sheena!!!
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 7:04 am
by jdogric12
And it's gone! Thanks Peter.
Now back to our regularly scheduled program...
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:54 am
by doctorwho
In one of my web searches (I can't remember the details now), I came across a page that had a link to what was supposed to be a relevant page; when I clicked on it, the page displayed was some spam/sales pitch, obviously unrelated to the original content. I went back to the first page and e-mailed that author, who was grateful that I had pointed that change out to him.
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 1:34 am
by jdogric12
Good point, Gary. I considered it may have been an error, but after studying the placement, timing, and content of his posts, it was pretty clear this person had no real interest in the forum. I am still open to the possibility I was incorrect, but... I don't think so. Anyone who saw the now-deleted posts would probably agree. But you're right, it's best to proceed with caution... or at least an exit strategy!
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 2:49 am
by admin
Thanks for your comments Jason. They were spot on!
Good point Gary, the situation that Jason noted here would seem to be of the type you have described. Unsupervised forums are a perfect target for this sort of thing.
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:15 am
by doctorwho
Boy, I know that for a fact! There is a forum called Raging Bull, and I often check the postings about my former company (I still have some stock in my 401K from them). For a while, the spammers were posting gazillions of spam messages every day, making it difficult to read the real postings. I did complain, and maybe that helped, because RB has since cleaned up the board and now the postings are again relevant.
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:45 am
by sowhat
Well, at livejournal communities it may get even worse... it takes only a couple of minutes to register a new livejournal account and about the same time to become a member of a community. On New Year's (Dec 2006 & first days of Jan 2007), when moderators were on vacation or something, many Russian-speaking popular handmade communities (knick-knacks, handmade toys, knitting, etc were flooded with huge photos of a certain kind...