Page 3 of 4
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 6:10 pm
by chefothefuture
Graham-
Is one of those 9143? My long lost love?....
Sniff; I do miss 'er.....
Nice family tho
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:59 pm
by bobcat
NOT . . . FAIR . . .
You know you owe me a V63 now, right?
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:22 am
by 8mileshigh
... are all the horseshoes properly magnetized on the three?...........
Sure are! Although the '61 is weaker than the other two.
Is one of those 9143? My long lost love?....
Yes it is John. It's the one on the far left in the first pic. The other '59 is 9139
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:37 am
by markbass99
I see that Graham has the same philosophy that I do, when you see something that really turns you on you must have three of them, one isn't going to cut it. When I discovered that I really love early 73 4001's....yup, had to have three. Now that I've found out how nice the 4004's are converted to five strings...working on a trinity but it will be in progress for a while.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:46 am
by jps
Are you that way with women?
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:18 am
by teeder
Very nice Graham!
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:36 am
by morrow
OMG those are gorgeous.
Those early 4000 basses get to me in a big way. I have never seen one in the flesh .
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:49 am
by s4001
Is one of those the one from Voltage?
....that I really should've bought....
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:06 am
by 8mileshigh
I'm not sure Scott. I got them in Japan.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:18 am
by s4001
*flies to Japan*
I will vouch for the sound and playability and tone of those basses. The necks are on the largish side but they seem stable as granite.
...damn, I shoulda bought it....
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:31 am
by aceonbass
It seems like it would be pretty easy to replicate one of those basses using a 4001V63. It's really just a matter of acrylic fabrication and deletion of one pickup....along with a savings of around $8000.00.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:39 am
by rickfan60
The body shape is different different from a V63. The upper horn is about an inch shorter and the rest is much less refined. Also, headstock is larger. It would be easier to start from scratch as John Fay did with his.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:33 am
by aceonbass
Oh I can see the physical differences in the old 4000's. I think the upper horn is a little funky looking anyway. That part I would not want to replicate, but you know me Ted, I take what I like and work from there...kinda like my 4008 with the potato headstock. I know it's not the same but I think it looks better than the original.
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:52 pm
by johnallg
Late to the party, Graham, but they are just wonderful! Remember me in your will!
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:14 pm
by rickenbrother
Very nice Graham! You are one lucky guy.
Good for you my friend!