Page 3 of 3
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:12 pm
by scotty
Thanks for the above post Kevin i was not sure of the size difference but i can see now thanks.Ive have 06 330 and i think its thelarger headstock
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:26 pm
by ric330
Check this out. Some may not even notice the difference unless they were side by side.
Either way both cool. Nice BlueBust Headstock, scotty
Here are a couple of JG 330's:
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:31 pm
by scotty
Thanks for the post very interesting not much in it really is there, a slight variation.Thanks Kevin
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:44 am
by godber
You'd be surprised how much difference a 1/4 inch of wood will make to people on this forum...
I very much like all the changes that RIC are making, I'd just like to see one or two more in the UK shops so I can think about buying (another) one.
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:45 am
by btomlinson
Figures. I got my 06 360 with bigger headstock. I really don't like it. I love the guitar, it plays well and sounds great. It just figures that it would be perfect right after I buy one. Anyway, I like the new OLD headstock.
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:22 pm
by ric330
How that 06' 360 Treating you Brett?
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:14 am
by btomlinson
Kevin,
I like it so so much. I bought a Les Paul and a Marshall amp to play in a band again but it is the Rickenbacker and the Marshall that works so well.
Re: 2007.... Now Smaller Vintage Headstock??
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:48 pm
by ric330
That's great, I just bought an 07 360 JG and I absolutely couldn't be happier with the guitar.
The HiGains really drive the amps sweetly.