Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

Ric O'Sound wrote:
And yes, I agree with the others who say Danelectros are underrated. One of my ex-bandmates had a Longhorn bass that sounded fantastic through his rig. It was hard to believe something constructed that cheaply (and I mean that in a good way) could sound so good.

People (including me) think of Danos and they immediately picture masonite guitars with that weird tape around the edge that always shrinks and peels.

The Korea-made RI I've got is real wood, no tape, absolute top quality parts fit and finish. Flawless blackburst paint. The shape is the familiar longhorn, but the rest is yonks better.

I've been thinking about this and I just have to say it.
Overrated, Toasters.
Underrated, Hi Gains.

jingle_jangle wrote:People (including me) think of Danos and they immediately picture masonite guitars with that weird tape around the edge that always shrinks and peels.

The Korea-made RI I've got is real wood, no tape, absolute top quality parts fit and finish. Flawless blackburst paint. The shape is the familiar longhorn, but the rest is yonks better.

But the tape is the what Danos are all about! No tape = not really a Dano. I used to have a Longhorn RI bass with the tape, sold it a few months back.

jingle_jangle wrote:The Korea-made RI I've got is real wood, no tape, absolute top quality parts fit and finish. Flawless blackburst paint. The shape is the familiar longhorn, but the rest is yonks better.

Wow...I don't think I've ever seen one of those. I'm only familiar with the masonite ones. This one sounds really interesting. Do you happen to have any photos, Paul?

Clint wrote:I've been thinking about this and I just have to say it.
Overrated, Toasters.
Underrated, Hi Gains.

There's something to that statement.
Of course, you could always do what I did: Cheat.
Put Toaster covers on the HiGains. You get the "cosmetic coolness" factor of the toasters and you get to keep the HiGain sound.

1965 wrote:

jingle_jangle wrote:People (including me) think of Danos and they immediately picture masonite guitars with that weird tape around the edge that always shrinks and peels.

The Korea-made RI I've got is real wood, no tape, absolute top quality parts fit and finish. Flawless blackburst paint. The shape is the familiar longhorn, but the rest is yonks better.

But the tape is the what Danos are all about! No tape = not really a Dano. I used to have a Longhorn RI bass with the tape, sold it a few months back.

And I thought the masonite was what gave a Dano that "certain something"....

Just curious, as I saw a few posts here saying that Taylor acoustics are overrated. Can I ask what acoustics everybody likes?

Thanks

lyric_girl wrote:Just curious, as I saw a few posts here saying that Taylor acoustics are overrated. Can I ask what acoustics everybody likes?

Thanks

I just bought a new Martin D-16. It's my desert island acoustic. Love Guild maple bodies. Epiphones are a great value and sweet. Agreed about the Taylors, they're cold and sterile.

collin wrote:

rickosound wrote: Old Harmonys - I'm playing ours right now - a 1971 Rocket we got last year.

You can play guitar and type at the same time? I'm gonna call you guitar master! Impressive.

Easy...Type, play, type some more, play some more, type, play again, type....

I have two Martins, a D-28 and 35. While I enjoy them both, I tend to think they are overrated. I also have an Epi Masterbilt and for the price it is superb.

lyric_girl wrote:Just curious, as I saw a few posts here saying that Taylor acoustics are overrated. Can I ask what acoustics everybody likes?

Thanks

Rickenbackers, of course

But I had a chance to play Gary F.'s Lowden for a couple of weeks. Sweet; big, mellow sound with lots of character. A good friend has a Lariveé...also very sweet sound and playability. The Lowden had a definite handbuilt feeling to it, in a sort of arts-and-crafts way. The Lariveé was slicker.

But Ricks are slickest of all. And I can't take credit for that...the DNA was already firmly in place; I'm only the replicator.

kiramdear wrote: Agreed about the Taylors, they're cold and sterile.

That's an apt description. I've called them the "Lexus" of acoustics; they are not cheap, well-crafted (although the bolt-on neck, though expedient, is anti-craft IMO) and well-finished, consistently of very good quality, do their job well, sell like the proverbial haute cakes, and leave you hungry a half-hour later...their character seems to be no character. Lots of folks love them for just this feature, though. Take a look at the threads on various acoustic guitar forums.

I've been to the Taylor factory a couple times, and it is kinda weird. I didn't know that about the scientology bit, just makes it even weirder. As for other acoustics, I like my Martin. It's a lot like Fender and Gibson though: there are good ones out there but there's a lot of **** too. In general, standard models never really attract me. I always fall for the usually pricier but also better made vintage reissues. ('57 Strat RI, '57 LP RI, OM Martin, 4001C64)

Best Bang/Buck acoustics I can think of are Yamaha Acoustics (good deals used, try before buying though) and Larrivee continues to make wonderful guitars are down to earth prices.

If you're on a tight budget, Yamaha is probably your best bet for quality at a low price. Couldn't get more boring, but they are fine guitars.

1965 wrote:If you're on a tight budget, Yamaha is probably your best bet for quality at a low price. Couldn't get more boring, but they are fine guitars.

Meh, most acoustics have the same general look... Martins Headstock has to be the dullest for me...


However, nothing is worse than Martin's high end super gaudy "Let's see how much abalone we can squeeze in" Guitars.