Page 3 of 4

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:14 pm
by leftybass
+1.

Pretty amazing.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:56 pm
by rsm
FG over AFG - always, no question for me.

This is my 620 FG:

Image


Peace.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 12:59 am
by goofyfoot
I prefer the ambered variety. Thanks for starting this thread, Stringsncords. Ciao for now.......Goofyfoot.

Image Image Image Image Image Image

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:03 am
by rsm
scotty wrote:No bother mike heres one bought recently from a forum member for all you 4 stringed lovers!
Image
My goodness this so makes me yearn for a 4003...
This finish and wood grain is absolutely stunning! I hope my 4003 (on order since '06) looks as good!

Peace.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:36 am
by johnallg
Richard, very nice 620 FG! Love the blend and color.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 10:03 am
by scoobster28
My two cents: I like the older version of the regular fireglo. I don't like the black at all, and would much rather have the red. However, the old AFG without the black was also pretty. That is not to say I want the huge transition from the red to the center, but I think the Carl Wilson Fireglos were amazing... which is why I bought one!

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:42 am
by scotty
So much for a quick survey.Seen everyone else is at it! :roll:
Image

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:52 pm
by rsm
Color, like tone, is subjective. As soon as I saw the versus in the title, I knew this was going to be a big opinion-fest!

The added benefit is people showing examples of instruments with their preferred finish!

I'd say the question is a winner, though not "Quick"! ;)

Peace.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:21 pm
by scotty
Indeed. Your right Richard! :mrgreen:

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:40 pm
by JakeK
I love the fireglo on my 1997 reissue. The amber fireglo is nice, but I think fireglo is best when ambered on it's own.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:19 pm
by cassius987
I actually really prefer my AFGs, but I wouldn't care if they were FG or MG either. I didn't buy them based on finish--didn't have a choice either time.

For my fretless I actually think the overall yellow binding, yellow dot inlays, AFG finish look is really key to the aesthetic. For my fretted bass it's not as important but still cool.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:25 pm
by godber
I liked the later version AFG, especially on the full width inlays. It gave them more of a subtle champagne colour like the vintage sparkly inlays. Still not so sure about the yellow binding through. So I'll vote for the new FG - some superb examples have been presented here...that 4003, wow. Rickenbacker are getting better and better.

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:39 pm
by godber
Oh yeah and if we are all gratuitously showing...and here's a "pinky" 360FG I know.

Image

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:54 am
by dog
This thread has some of the nicest FG/AFG finishes on the planet. Unfortunately, for every one that has such a nice blending of colors, I find five that look like this.
Looks kind of cheap to me

Re: AFG vs FG - A Quick Survey

Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:47 pm
by dog
No disrespect to FG lovers, but here is another. It's because of the inconsistant FG finishes that I chose basic black. Fireglo is probably Ric's best color. Just as long as it isn't one of these amateur looking finishes. Just my opinion. :wink: