Page 3 of 4
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:53 am
by jc-sz
wints wrote:
Joaquin, that toaster was just set on the outside of the guard for the photo. I was being lazy! It slotted straight into the original guard there...
Thanks for the explanation! Now I was thinking, even if it does look funny, that could be a nice way to bring it closer to the strings if the volume does not quite match with the high gain on the bridge... right? I would think two screws would very well hold it in place...
Nice Rick Army btw! I didn't know that the new full-width inlays were not new at all... funny thing.
Cheers
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:55 am
by jc-sz
wints wrote:The new FG seems the best for a long time. It'll be a classic in the years to come. I'm not always a fan, as it does vary so much, but when you find a good year...
PS: I didn't understand the part were you weren't a big fan of FG
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:11 pm
by thx1955
As a few of you may know I've this thing for Fireglo, that's as nice a Fireglo as I've ever seen, congratulations.
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:22 pm
by rickenbrother
thx1955 wrote:As a few of you may know I've this thing for Fireglo.
NO!! Really?!? 
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:05 pm
by thx1955
wints wrote:The new FG seems the best for a long time. It'll be a classic in the years to come. I'm not always a fan, as it does vary so much, but when you find a good year...
johnallg wrote:Very nice, Mike! That puppy is screaming out for CB....
Absolutely..
Andrew,
You post that particular picture to torture me !!!
Gorgeous Fireglos
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:28 am
by Lost Coyotes
This has been bugging me ever since I realized I had done it.
I'll just say that I was so goofy over the gorgeous new FG that I forgot proper English.
Peter: In my original post in this thread...would you be so kind as to remove that apostrophe from "its"?
I'd appreciate that.
"Red and most of it's variants are..."
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 8:48 pm
by wints
Glad you enjoyed Jim...
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:04 pm
by johnallg
wints wrote:Glad you enjoyed Jim...
Jim, Andy posts that picture to torture us all!
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:44 pm
by rickenbrother
johnallg wrote:wints wrote:Glad you enjoyed Jim...
Jim, Andy posts that picture to torture us all!
It was even nicer to see Andy's Ricks in person, as I did at SERF.
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:58 pm
by johnallg
rickenbrother wrote:johnallg wrote:wints wrote:Glad you enjoyed Jim...
Jim, Andy posts that picture to torture us all!
It was even nicer to see Andy's Ricks in person, as I did at SERF.
Yeah, rub it in! Rub it in.....
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:03 am
by Lost Coyotes
One more; comparing 1971 and 2009 Fireglos.
I wonder how close they'll be after 38 more years?
I likely won't know the answer... 
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:28 am
by teeder
Very nice, Mike!
Now you need a MG V63!
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:04 pm
by libratune
Here's a comparison (also posted on a 4001C64 thread) of two 4001C64 FG models, one made in 2005 (lighter) and the other in 2006 (darker). What a difference one year makes!
Which FG do you prefer?
- 4001C64 05 06 Full Front
- 4001C64 05 06 Body Front
- 4001C64 05 06 Body Back
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:12 pm
by winston
thb_bassman wrote:In my original post in this thread...would you be so kind as to remove that apostrophe from "its"?
I'd appreciate that.
I took care of that for you Mike.
Re: Example for the FireGlo resistant
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:49 pm
by teeder
Ron,
The one on the left is sweet!