Page 3 of 5

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:54 pm
by marc61
Hey, I could be wrong here but, I think the neck is obviously no problem but, the body is. Had it been a unique design fine, but that body is Ric shaped. Seems like that would be infringing.

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:12 pm
by krick
The bass was relisted appears to have sold:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... NA:US:1123

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:48 pm
by TheFountainHead
Haha nice ad - someone got a steal. That's basically a custom shop bass that sold for half the value of a new 4003. PLus the 3001 neck is creamy, albeit a bit heavy and neck-dive prone - but that's the nature of the beast.

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:06 am
by ram
James, welcome to the forum!

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 10:51 am
by jingle_jangle
$1K? that's about $10.00/hour for all that work... :?

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:52 pm
by Rockin' James
There was a phone number listed with the auction, I talked to him and he described it quite differently. The parts came from the person who contacted him to build the body to fit the neck he already had. Time spent on the project was about 10 hours: that's $100 an hour the way I see it to build a body and paint it.
You know what they say about opinions!

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:24 pm
by aceonbass
Did Dale actually say he only had 10 hours in the project? The neck also had to be set into the body and painted along with it. I don't see only 10 hours work involved, unless of course Dale said that's what he had in it. Since Paul W. does this professionally, I would have more faith in his estimate. The auction already stated the neck was a stock RIC part, so I don't see anything "quite different" going on.

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:07 pm
by ram
I would think finishing would take almost that long.... but what do I know??? :? :?

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:23 pm
by johnallg
Somebody got a steal and a great looking instrument.

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:03 am
by dminer
I missed the pics but from what I've read here it sounded like a 330 style bass. I sure was hoping that something like this was what we we're "Getting ready to flip out over" from Rickenbacker...I'm still getting ready to flip out but after a couple of years of waiting I don't think anything is gonna happen...perphaps they should have told us to get ready to very slowly get excited over maybe, perphaps, eventually one of these days we'll see something new!

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 11:01 am
by aceonbass
The Fortune 3301.....

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:11 pm
by gearhed289
dminer wrote:I sure was hoping that something like this was what we we're "Getting ready to flip out over" from Rickenbacker...I'm still getting ready to flip out but after a couple of years of waiting I don't think anything is gonna happen
Well it's a good thing nothing has happened, cause I'd already forgotten I was supposed to be ready to flip out. I'd have been caught totally off guard! :lol: :lol:

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:17 pm
by paologregorio
1K is a pretty nice price.

Some folks don't seem to like the reverse headstock, but recall that the bass was built to customer requested specs.

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:39 pm
by johnallg
paologregorio wrote:1K is a pretty nice price.

Some folks don't seem to like the reverse headstock, but recall that the bass was built to customer requested specs.
For a grand I'd happily have bought it.... :cry:

Re: Fortune 3301

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:52 pm
by harrek
johnallg wrote:
paologregorio wrote:1K is a pretty nice price.

Some folks don't seem to like the reverse headstock, but recall that the bass was built to customer requested specs.
For a grand I'd happily have bought it.... :cry:
Still needed to go in the 'right' direction though.....