Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:10 pm
jdogric12 wrote:jps wrote:Speaking of J Dog, anyone see the back cover of the July '11 issue of Bass Player?
Nope. What did we miss??
Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Not quite an S
Page 3 of 4
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 2:43 pm
Nice cat, my chinchilla got to my hofner and put a little scratch in the back a while back, im sure your cat is tame thoughjdogric12 wrote:no bass? put this in your pipe and smoke it!
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:11 pm
Love the HS & toaster Jdog... and "S" is beSt in my book. 
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:05 pm
Well I've finally got it back and complete! Big thanks to Ken Joseph, who custom made a metal piece to use as a truss rod spacer. Since the rods adjust at the body, and are spread much farther apart than headstock-adjusting ones, a custom piece was needed, since replacements from this transitional period are nearly impossible to come by. I've got it wired up as a 4001v63 would be, with toaster, horsie, and mono output. This thing clanks way better than any Rick bass I've ever owned.
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:17 pm
Looks great!
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:19 pm
Thats nice! Do you ever plan on having the fretboard replaced to make it "Quite the S"?
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:28 pm
The bass looks great, Jason. 
If you go with Ivan's suggestion make it a fretless bass with no dots on the fingerboard. The HS pickup looks perfect, now get out that router/drill/chisel/hammer/whatever and move that toaster pickup to it's proper location! 
If you go with Ivan's suggestion make it a fretless bass with no dots on the fingerboard. The HS pickup looks perfect, now get out that router/drill/chisel/hammer/whatever and move that toaster pickup to it's proper location! Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:15 pm
It's the opposite, trim-wise, of the 1993.
Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:24 pm
Fretted!jps wrote:The bass looks great, Jason.
, and I agree with the toaster position.Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 9:16 am
Just play it.
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 1:03 pm
That could work as well!ken_j wrote:Just play it.
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 1:10 pm
Well it's different, but cool having the triangle inlays with the S body. Enjoy it, Jdog!
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:26 pm
Nice bass, Jdog. I'm with Ivan, what'dya gonna do about that fretboard? Very interesting and different look all the same
Very interesting and different look all the sameYep.paologregorio wrote:Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2011 10:49 pm
Lovely!JakeK wrote:Nice bass, Jdog. I'm with Ivan, what'dya gonna do about that fretboard?
Yep.paologregorio wrote:Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
Re: Not quite an S
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 2:14 pm
Stunning bass and wonderful mod. I've always preferred the S body. I also prefer dots to triangles, but I LOVE the bound neck on the unbound body. Anyway, it looks awesome. I'd love to know how it sounds.