Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by godber »

Electrostring wrote:Duesenberg just came out with a Mike Campbell guitar... of the two this take on the 350 is more interesting,imo. A limited run 350V89 might be an idea. Still, somehow I already see the threads about new owners changing the scratchplate to white, the knobs to vintage black, wiring to 5 knobs, refins... I'm in need of a break from RRF as well, I'm getting grumpy :roll:
As long as people own screwdrivers they will change guitars. Some people like plain, some people like fancy - that's diversity Werner...chill out :D
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by rkbsound »

Between the Nashville floods, recent thefts of guitars and stages falling on them, I wonder if making back-up replicas will become the new trend for the big acts. I suppose they wouldn't be back ups, since they would become the main stage players as this would allow the real ones to stay home or in the studio. They are getting to be too valuable to play.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by paologregorio »

I too was able to try out the "MC" prototype that was at NAMM. It's as Rich reported; wide, flat, and with a very shallow curve depth. The guitar was a joy to play. If I owned a couple of these, my Gretsch Jet models might stay in their cases permanently. . .
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by electrofaro »

godber wrote:As long as people own screwdrivers they will change guitars. Some people like plain, some people like fancy - that's diversity Werner...chill out :D
It's time Obama's going to do something about screwdriver ownership before there are more innocent victims :twisted:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

johnhall wrote:
LenMinNJ wrote:John: Will the 350V89 (if that's what we've been calling the 350MC 'til now will be called) be offered through your dealers?
There are no immediate plans to do so and I really don't know what the future will bring on this one.
Thanks for the response, John.

If we gathered a critical mass of pre-orders (with deposits) that could be placed with one of your dealers to help you make your decision, what would that number of orders be?
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

JakeK wrote:The deal with the 350 was that they were making the 660/12 Tom Petty model, and asked Mike if he wanted a guitar, which became the 350 we know today. Tom's prototype 660/12 and Mike's 350 were both made in 1989, so there's a good chance they have the same neck.
I've been revisiting the specs of the neck on Mike Campbell's 1989 custom 350 (which I'll call "350MC"). My interest was revived by the pictures of the 350V89 prototype shown at NAMM 2013.

Both have a 24-fret, dot inlay neck. We don't know for certain, but I'm assuming that they both have a 1.75" width at the nut, like the 660-12TP made at the same time as the original 350MC. The folks who've examine both the original 350MC and the 350V89 say that they also have an unusually flat neck profile, unlike any other Rickenbacker guitar.

Since both necks have 24 frets and a glued-in design (with a tenon that fits in a pocket - a mortise - rather than a neck-through design) it's clearly not a 660 neck, which is a 21-fret neck and is a neck-through design extending the entire length of the guitar.

But for the original 350MC guitar, Rickenbacker could have started with a neck blank for a 660. They would have had to lengthen the neck and heel, fit a 24-fret fretboard, and modify the wood that normally becomes the center part of the 660's body into a tenon.

It's possible they did all that for a one-off for Mike's custom guitar, but if they were to go into production, they'd need to make the neck correctly from scratch, instead of re-working 660 neck blanks.

So, from what I can tell, if someone wanted to make a 350MC replica, they'd have to go the route of either seriously modifying a 660 neck or building one from scratch, because there's still no current Rickenbacker model that has a neck that's close to the 350MC neck's specifications.

Have I missed something? Are there any Rickenbacker six-string guitars other than the 660 that have the 1.75" width at the nut?
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by electrofaro »

LenMinNJ wrote:Have I missed something? Are there any Rickenbacker six-string guitars other than the 660 that have the 1.75" width at the nut?
Well, recent 330-series one-offs had a 660 neck, and they're not neck-through, although all 21fretters
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by ken_j »

LenMinNJ wrote:...
Have I missed something? Are there any Rickenbacker six-string guitars other than the 660 that have the 1.75" width at the nut?
650
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

ken_j wrote:650
Right - it does have 24 frets and is 1.75" wide at the nut. Thanks!

It turns out that the 650 necks have different issues. Besides being neck-through, they also have a shaped neck heel. And the recessed pickups and different bridge height (relative to a 350 or 660) changes the depth of its neck and the height of its fretboard above the body. All of those factors make using a 650 neck even more difficult than a 660 neck.

Electrostring wrote:Well, recent 330-series one-offs had a 660 neck, and they're not neck-through, although all 21fretters
Oh - that's potentially very interesting! To which one-offs are you referring?
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by electrofaro »

LenMinNJ wrote:Oh - that's potentially very interesting! To which one-offs are you referring?
This one:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rickenbacker-19 ... 7675.l2557

The other one seems to be removed from eBay already... can't find the thread here at RRF :roll:

This one is interesting for having a 350 neck and reference to Petty:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rickenbacker-33 ... 1200209729
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

Thanks very much!

The first one is a 12-string, which rules it out due to its very different headstock.

The second one's specs say it has a 1.63" width at the nut.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by electrofaro »

LenMinNJ wrote:The first one is a 12-string, which rules it out due to its very different headstock.
Doesn't make much sense to me - it's the neck we're talking about, not the headstock shape or the amount of strings :idea:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by JakeK »

According to sources who have observed both Campbell's guitar and the "back-up", both guitars have a square neck heel, ala the 325 reissues of the era (which includes the V59, V63 and the JL signature model), and Campbell stated in The Guitars documentary on TomPetty.com that it was all based on "John Lennon's guitar on The Ed Sullivan Show". The V59 was the closest thing to what Campbell was referring to and Campbell's original is notable for having a 325V59 pickguard, and the new 2012/13 version(s) were supposed to be an exact duplicate of the original. I have no idea as to whether pickguards on the new versions were specifically designed for the project or if they were left over from when the V series ceased in 2001.
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by k43rover »

JakeK wrote: I have no idea as to whether pickguards on the new versions were specifically designed for the project or if they were left over from when the V series ceased in 2001.

Judging by some of the comments on the very recent f-hole guitars, looks like the factory have finally started making bespoke guards in limited quantities rather than using (often ill-fitting) leftovers. So these may well be new.
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

Electrostring wrote:
LenMinNJ wrote:The first one is a 12-string, which rules it out due to its very different headstock.
Doesn't make much sense to me - it's the neck we're talking about, not the headstock shape or the amount of strings :idea:
Well, we're talking about the 350MC and 350V89, which are both 6-string guitars.

And in case it wasn't clear, I am thinking about making a replica of the 350MC.
Last edited by LenMinNJ on Sun Feb 03, 2013 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”