Re: What's the Fascination with Old Instruments?
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 7:21 pm
It's the "aroma" from old gear, and old cases!
...wisdom
...wisdom
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
drumbob wrote:I have been buying and selling used and vintage guitars for years and was there at the outset of the madness over vintage guitars and the introduction of high prices. There were reasons why this happened. Higher prices for vintage guitars arose partially due to the fact that some companies had serious lapses in quality at certain points in time, such as Fender and Gibson. If the current production models were ****, players longed for the old ones, because they were made better. Some of it was due to rarity, if certain models were not produced in large numbers, like the Flying V and Explorer, the prices escalated. Some of it was due to hero worship. Guitarists wanted the same model their hero played and that guitar was in short supply, like the 58-60 Les Paul Standard Burst. All the British blues players wanted to sound like Eric Clapton at one point, so vintage Les Pauls became desirable, as they did here, when players saw Keith Richards and Mike Bloomfield playing Bursts.
Early vintage guitar dealers capitalized on all this and a new retail industry was born around 1975 or so. I was there and saw it happen. You had honest dealers like George Gruhn in Nashville, but also obnoxious and sometimes dishonest sharks, like the owner of Guitar Tr*****, right here in New Jersey, who preyed upon musicians who wanted the old guitars. I knew him quite well. He closed his store, took his money and got out of town very quickly.
Sometimes dealers get together and agree to drive up prices of guitars. It's call price fixing and it's illegal. I know for a fact that two prominent vintage dealers singlehandedly and surreptitiously raised the prices of Fender Jazzmasters and Jaguars years ago and the industry somehow followed suit. Now, you can't touch a vintage example of either of these guitars for under thousands of dollars. Prior to that, they were cheap and easy to find for a song.
Certain companies, like Guild and Rickenbacker, really didn't suffer the terrible quality issues as others did. Guild never had bad quality. They were very consistent over the years, but most Guild guitars are "sleepers" on the vintage market, compared to Gibson and Fender. Rickenbacker seems to have had consistently good quality. Martin had their issues in the 70's.
Buy what you like. If you have the money and want an old guitar, buy it, but don't look upon the purchase as an investment, unless it's a real blue chip collectible, like a pre-war Martin, or vintage Les Pauls, Strats and the like. Be an educated consumer.
That's an interesting point. What exactly does qualify as vintage? Does old make something vintage?bvstudios wrote:It's beginning to dawn on me that most of my guitars could be considered "old"..

No. "Vintage", specifically as it pertains to "vintage guitars", is a misnomer. It is in reference to a widely agreed-upon "golden age" of guitar manufacturing and, perhaps depending on the manufacturer, has a cutoff point.Tommy wrote:That's an interesting point. What exactly does qualify as vintage? Does old make something vintage?bvstudios wrote:It's beginning to dawn on me that most of my guitars could be considered "old"..
Here's my 360/12. I got it brand new in 1992. That means this guitar is nearly 30 years old. Can it be sold as "vintage"?
Thanks.sloop_john_b wrote:No. "Vintage", specifically as it pertains to "vintage guitars", is a misnomer. It is in reference to a widely agreed-upon "golden age" of guitar manufacturing and, perhaps depending on the manufacturer, has a cutoff point.Tommy wrote: That's an interesting point. What exactly does qualify as vintage? Does old make something vintage?
It does beg the question who exactly determines these "golden ages" and which manufacturers are allowed to be in the club?sloop_john_b wrote: It is in reference to a widely agreed-upon "golden age" of guitar manufacturing and, perhaps depending on the manufacturer, has a cutoff point.

It might help if Eric Clapton would please chime in and explain what he was thinking when he (now famously) bought up batches of old electric guitars on his visits to the U.S. I think that was in the 1970s.stringsncords wrote: ... Opinions, please ...
100%. Part of what makes defining "vintage" complicated is that it's dependent on the interests of the individual and is dependent on the manufacturer.Tommy wrote:those guitars really do represent a golden age of guitars for a style of metal music.
I did not listen to those bands other than what I saw on MTV, but those metal shredders from the mid '80s were talented folks. I didn't like what they were playing, but, boy, they could play. I was buying guitar magazines galore back then, and every single issue was wall to wall '80s metal shredders. I used to learn a lot of James Hetfield Metallica rhythms because I saw great value in learning that stuff. I can play mean rhythm because of those shredders.sloop_john_b wrote:1984 was smack dab in the middle of a watershed era for shred guitar players and shred guitars. For shred guitars and heavy metal, they represent that golden age.
I resemble that remark!sloop_john_b wrote:No Scotty, it's completely black or white. You either buy newer guitars or you're snobby and insecure. There is no middle ground. Just admit that you're snobby and insecure like the rest of us.scotty wrote:Im totally insecure I love the smell of older guitars.
I don't understand why buying what you like makes you insecure?
I like Rics,I like modern and old but I prefer old.
My fascination Bob is the way the older Xbraced models sound and feel with slim necks and small headstocks.
We like what we like.
I resemble this remark, too!Therefore, finding examples that haven’t failed (of ANYTHING that’s, say, 50 years old) is more and more rare every day.
I'm really sorry to be the bearer of bad news Kevin, but yes, it does. I think Tommy was very clear early on in this thread.teeder wrote: I paid less for my all original '62 p-bass than what some reissues costs. Does that make me snobby and insecure? Now I'm confused.![]()