NAMM 2005 pictures

jps · Post by **jps** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:53 pm

I did that bit of fooling around in PS 5.5

oreca · Post by **oreca** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 6:21 am

Yeah Save For Web is very good, but I find that in Photoshop 7 it didn't make pictures as dark... Maybe that's just my mind playing tricks...
It's most likely because of the compression you have to make a picture go through to post it!

jingle_jangle · Post by **jingle_jangle** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 6:37 am

I use Adobe CS at my office, and PS 5 (my favorite for everything except web work) at home. But Patrick, you're right about the compression. CS does a better job, IME. To compress in PS5, I have to keep juggling size of picture and size of file. I usually end up at smallest file=worst detail (digital artifacts due to .jpg compression). Not the best scenario...

RutleDirk · Post by **RutleDirk** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:30 am

Hey, RIC...

May I please have that Blueburst 4003 that was on display at NAMM?

You're done with it now, right?

thx1955 · Post by **thx1955** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:40 pm

Good idea Dennis !

Mr Hall, I'd like the Fireglo 4004 please, I'll even drive to Santa Ana to pic it up if that would make it easier !!!!

jwilli · Post by **jwilli** » Tue Feb 15, 2005 8:39 am

I doctored this pic a number of years ago......pretty close to the real BBR if I may say so

http://www.homestead.com/aurs/files/6465c.jpg

jps · Post by **jps** » Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:32 pm

Very nice!