Page 4 of 4
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:51 pm
by jps
Sure. E-mail me your address.
As to making a V63 surround into a mid '60s type it would be very close but the taper is slightly longer, but not enough to make a difference visually.
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 6:26 pm
by ken_swearingen
The sides of the surround might be tough to replicate ,but an excellent idea with all the talent hear on the forum i cant see why there it would be impossible Ted ,Jeff,Sergio, opinions,ideas
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:06 pm
by baltimucho
I have a friend with a sheet-metal business. He stamps steel lamps all day and he told me he could replicate ANYTHING in sheet-metal.
If I only had one to make a pattern from...
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:24 pm
by ken_swearingen
there you go jeff,how to make a template??
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 8:05 am
by wints
All good ideas guys and thanks for the input. Personally, being a more of a purist in this case I really would like an original....
Jeff, I'd love to get to the confluence and cross you palm with cabbage but that isn't possible at present. E mail me offline if you want to talk...
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:37 pm
by jps
e-mail sent!
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 4:19 am
by jps
Another question! Which mounting plate shape did McCartney's 4001S have originally? I know that Mark Arnquist made a new pickguard for his bass, I assume it was shaped like Paul's original pickguard. Compare the shape of his and the '63 in the Smith book. Was Paul's HS surround like that of the '63 with the rounded corners as on the late V63/current C64 surrounds or squared off as on Chris Squire's?
I reversed the Smith '63 image to better see the shapes for comparison. What do you think?
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 8:57 am
by ken_swearingen
It was just like squires they all were squared off .The 63 in the smith book has a reissue surround I'm sure of it look at surrounds of the 50s,60s there all squared off accept for the 63 in the smith book.all early v63and cs's were more period correct than the later ones,why is a mystery
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 11:45 am
by jps
Why is the corner cut in a curve like that on Paul's bass, if not to match the curve on the surround? Squire's and others have a much tighter radius to the corner, which makes sense if the corners on the surround was more squared off. Is this just another magical mystery tour?
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 12:02 pm
by ken_swearingen
actually try to find some pic's of Pm's bass before the fixed pickguard.