Page 4 of 6

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:42 pm
by cheyenne
Got one.

Image

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 5:58 pm
by relayer4u
Please don't cover any of THAT wood with a piece o plastic!

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........Crazy Flame Glo bass...

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:23 pm
by johnallg
Scott, with a handle like Cheyenne, that was a given!

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:25 pm
by nukebass
This may be a silly question, but how much different would a 4004 with high-gain pickups be from a 4003(S)? All the dimensions listed on the webpage are the same and both have maple necks and bodies. Are the necks that much different?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:31 pm
by johnallg
Yes. The 4004 has a little bit wider neck face but is thinner front to back. My '95 4004C neck is a lot easier to get around on than my '04 4003.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:35 pm
by jps
I thought you sold that, Scott?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:41 pm
by aceonbass
My favorite RIC is a 4003S and my favorite pickups are HB1's. A 4004 is almost the perfect blend of these two elements, especially since they don't make a 4003S anymore. I also like the bridge on the 4004 a lot more.

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:12 pm
by bobcat
John: Yeah, I know, the guard looks a little short, but that's because the two pictures that were used were at slightly different angles, so, while the 4004 was head-on, the 4003 that the pickguard was taken from was tilted back. At one point, I altered it in MSPaint (because that is the extent of my graphical abilities), but I lost the picture when I had to replace my hard drive several months ago. I'll probably redo it, just to make it look more "normal".

But yeah . . . 4004 body contours, walnut headstock wings, and a gorgeous pickguard . . . mmmmmmmmmm.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:18 am
by 86kubicki
John - I like that 4003 with the HB in the bridge position! I'm not a fan of the 4003's bridge pickup "assembly", (especially the cover which I immediately remove). As far as the 4004 goes, I like the idea of a pickguard. I've always thought it looked a little bare.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:55 am
by cheyenne
Ray,,dont be silly. Image

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:56 am
by cheyenne
Jeff. The deal is pending, I am a very patient man.

By the way Jeff, do you ever miss yours?

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:03 am
by markbass99
It's getting close to the one year anniversary of when I got Jeff's 4004 Cii via Chris Pappas in May 06. This bass has gone through some significant changes since his ownership but still retains the Hipshot tuners, VVT pots and V63 TRC.

I think Jeff sold it because the neck was a little too thick for him and if that's true I highly recommend trying a Laredo. The Laredo necks are so much thinner, they have the same feel as my 73 4001's but with a slightly wider fretboard.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:08 am
by kcole4001
To answer Ryan's question: the 4004 with Higains would still likely sound bassier than a 4003 due to the different pickup locations.
I'm think someone's tried this combination, but I can't remember for sure.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:28 am
by jps
"By the way Jeff, do you ever miss yours?"

I do sometimes, but Mark's answer was why I sold it. A JG Laredo would be nice if the neck feels like my '73 4001 or '98 4001V63. Maybe I will have the chance to play one at MARF II.

Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 7:32 am
by jwr2
I love the 4004 neck ... it is perfect for 5 strings ... I am thinking I want to get another 4004 to convert 4-2-5 ... I am thinking of putting in 2 high gains converted to toasters and wiring it vvt ...