Page 4 of 6

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:20 pm
by johnallg
Woot! I'm bringing a few choice ones myself!

I've found my 11th post, but thats as far back as I can find - don't think my first post's forum is archived yet.

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:55 pm
by jimk
I found my fourth post, but none earlier. It's late, and I'm going to bed.


Speaking of cigars, I had a real nice maduro Bolivar once upon a time. I prefer Lonsdales, myself.

JimK

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:08 pm
by doctorwho
My posts date to a time before "Post Number" was included, so that makes things a bit more difficult ... that said, I think that I found mine:
Posted on Tuesday, June 11, 2002 - 11:29 pm:

I have a mid-1970s 4001FL BG (right-handed guitar) that has an interesting 'situation' with its neck binding. Apparently, the guitar was used by a left-handed player at one time; to accommodate this, a 'luthier' (you'll see why I use the term loosely) switched the top and bottom neck bindings. However, the original top binding (having the fret markers in it), when moved to the bottom of the neck, was installed with the fret markers going the wrong direction, i.e. narrow spacing near the nut, wider spacing near the body. I'm not sure a 'real' luthier would make that mistake.

So my dilemma is that this fretless bass currently has no usable fret markers on either side of the neck, so it's not very playable either left- or right-handed. How difficult is it to remove the neck bindings and switch them back to their correct positions? Is this something I can do myself (I'm no luthier, but I am a 'McGyver' type of tinkerer, handy with tools and machines). One thing to note: the previous switch is noticeable with regard to the finish on the neck near the binding, so unless I do something really clutzy, I don't think I can make things worse than it already is in that regard.

Any input from the experts will be greatly appreciated.

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:24 pm
by doctorwho
Paul: here's your first one:

http://archives.rickresource.com/vibrolaarchives/vibrolajanjun2005/messages/86033/32029.html
paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
New member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: xx.xxx.x.x

Posted on Wednesday, December 29, 2004 - 04:41 pm: Edit Post Print Post
Dear Luis and other members:

I've been finishing product prototypes, cars, and guitars, for almost four decades now. (Guitar finishing technology is akin more to car painting these days than to furniture finishing, as it used to be!) I teach these crafts on a university level to automotive and product design students.

The RED rubbing compound you are using (Du Pont #7 or Turtle Wax brand in a flat green and white can?) is way too abrasive for glossing up a guitar, especially the finish on a Rick. It can work in the hands of an experienced pro, but it's dicey because it'll slash right through all the paint coats on edges and possibly eat through the clearcoat into the undercoats or even bare wood, given half a chance. Du Pont does make a white compound called (right on the can) Polishing Compound. I believe it's #22. At any rate, it's about as agressive as you want for a guitar.

I agree with Peter on Meguiar's products--they are good for what you're trying to do. I have an even "hotter" tip, though, and it's one I've used repeatedly over the last decade or so with really fine results.

This is a three-step process, consisting of (1) rubbing out the dull paint finish, (2) glazing to remove the swirl marks and haze which rubbing out leaves, and (3) waxing with a water-based, non-abrasive quality wax to fill any other tiny "haze" marks (actually microscopic scratches) and to seal and protect the surface.

You need three specific products, although there are alternates which I will mention later: You will also need several cloth diapers (preferably clean) or soft COTTON T-shirts with NO silkscreening on them! These are torn into pieces and used to apply, rub in, and wipe off the various grades of abrasives and the wax itself. You'll start out with the coarsest abrasive and work towards the fine glaze, ending up with wax. DO NOT under any circumstances use any poly/cotton or manmade synthetic fabric, no matter how soft it seems to feel.

3M "Perfect-It II" Rubbing Compound (their product #05974) is used on a slightly-dampened COTTON cloth, as the first step. Not too much of this compound, not too little. Rub fairly hard on a small flat area and you'll see the gloss come up as the product breaks down. WATCH THE EDGES; around the sound hole and guitar edges, headstock, etc.--wherever there's a sharpish corner. Try to avoid these completely until the flat areas are done, then just give them a SLIGHT lick and a promise. Add compound as required.

Work a small area (a couple of square inches at a time only) until glossy, and then move on. When the entire guitar has a nice level of hazy but glossy surface, move on to the glaze.

(Step #2) I recommend 3M "Perfect-It III Trizact" Machine Glaze, applied of course by hand. This is their product # 05930. Again, clean cloth, dry this time, work small areas, stay away from edges and corners. The guitar should look nearly water-wet following this stage. Then TWO coats of a water-based pure wax blend (Meguair's Medallion or Zymol are two preferred products). I stay away from waxes which use a petroleum distillate as a solvent, as they do not allow "build" and will yellow the guitar's finish in time and possibly also lead to checking after several years.

Wipe off any excess material from each step before moving on to the next step and next grade of liquid material. Finally, buff carefully with another absolutely clean, dry cotton cloth. Results may vary with your experience level, but if you keep at it, it will eventually blind you in a good way...SHINY, my friend.

Do NOT use any kind of rubbing compound on any metal parts, especially chrome! 3M Imperial Hand Glaze (#39007) works well on chrome and plastic like pickguards and tailpieces.
And no, I did not have this memorized, copied, etc. ... I was trying to find mine and this one (as well as some others) popped up during my unconventional (and circuitous) search procedure.

Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:25 pm
by wayang
Man...he hasn't changed much, has he?

Well, neither has any of us...

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:06 am
by jwr2
I think this may have been my first or close to my first post from from early November 2002 ...

"The 60's pickups are cool but they are not as hot as the high gain ... I tried taking the capacitor out of my '68 ric and it sounded dull and lifeless ... the old horseshoe pickups need the capacitor to get that ric bite ... The 70's high gain pickups stand well on their own but the 70's basses came with the capacitor ... the 70's basses sound better without the capacitor ... somewhere in the 80's the 4003 pickups got even hotter and the capacitor was no longer included ... the 4003 is louder and a little thicker sounding than the 4001's from the 60's and 70's. Also the 4003s5 had the high gain bridge pickup and a toaster pickup in the neck ... this is a nice combo of smooth and nasty bite .... Ric pickups are great ... just don't put a friken humbucker in the ric ... depending on what pickups you use you can get a variety of sounds ... the cool part is they are all good ..."

These days I do like humbuckers in some basses ... especially the hb1 and hb2 ...

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:38 am
by rick_ovic
Here's my first from February 2005:-

Posted on Wednesday, February 02, 2005 - 11:31 pm:
"Hi All,

I've just become a forum member having lurked about for the past few months. Thanks for your views and great advice on all things Rickenbacker. I hope I can now contribute meaningfully too.

I'm located in Melbourne, Victoria. There are two Rickenbackers in my collection at the moment and a third on it's way. The first is my 1992 Model 340-12 in Fireglo. The second is my pride and joy...an April 1965 Export Model 1998 also in Fireglo. It's date of manufacture is two months before mine! On the way from the US is a 1966 Model 360-12, you guess it, in Fireglo. I'll post some photos once I can resize them.

Later this year I'm travelling to the East Coast of the US, primarily to go guitar huntin'. The range of Rickenbackers is just so much greater than what we have here in Australia. I'm going to attend the Summer Philly Vintage Guitar Expo, which just happens to be on my 40th birthday. Hopefully I can come home with a 1959-60 Capri and maybe a mid 60's 460!

Peter McC, thanks for providing such a great "virtual-venue" for us all to share our Rickenbacker passion.

Cheers, Darren"

It was fascinating to note that Aitch was the first to respond, followed by Glen Lambert, with Paul W welcoming me from overseas! Image

Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:01 pm
by sir_andrew_of_left_coast
The oldest I could find... although I spent only 5 minutes searching.



Posted on Monday, August 07, 2000 - 01:38 pm:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll add a little to this. The body shape can be traced back to such models as the 430 guitar and the 3001 bass. Later on (1980s), RIC introduced the 230 "Hamburg" and the 250 "El Dorado" models; the 250 being the deluxe version of the 230. These guitars can be seen at rickenbacker.com (view the on-line 1984 200 Series catalog). There were also bass versions of these: 2030 and 2050, respectively.

The Hamburg and El Dorado guitar/bass models were revised in the early 1990s to the 220/2020 and 260/2060, respectively. They were discontinued around 1995, with the 230GF (Glen Frey Signature Model) being the only remaining 200 Series guitar in production today.

The light oil finish necks on the 220/260 guitars are, indeed, quite nice. My 260 was also made in 1993, and first purchased (by me) in 1995. I suppose the 5-year warranty has just about expired by now. Of course, I never needed to make use of it...

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:23 pm
by lyle_from_minneapolis
AHA! Finally found it, from November 2006 in the Surf thread. Here goes:

There was a nice little era of response to surf music here in the upper Midwest in the mid-60's featuring bands like Gregory Dee and the Avantis ("Olds-Mo-William") and The Trashmen ("Surfin' Bird"...bird, bird, bird, ya bird is the word...). Really a great bunch of dance tunes. I was a kid listening to Beatles albums back then, but these bands stood right next to them in my mind at the time. I especially miss "Hey You Boy in the Be-Bop Glasses and the Suede Shoes, Come Here!" Can't remember who did that one. My all time fav surf tune to this day, however, is Wipeout. Used to imitate the opening maniacal laugh all the time, and still do the drum solo when I pound out pizzas at my restaurant.

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:06 pm
by kcole4001
I must say the new archive set up makes it very easy to search by date!
I found my first post.
I lurked, or more accurately, researched & read most everything of interest to me, for 17 days before posting this question:

----------------------------------------------
"Hi, I'm new here so I'd like some info about something I've seen mentioned in the for sale forum. I think it was Jeff who said he liked his 4 to 5 conversions better than his 4003s5's. Just what is involved in this? I have a fairly scuffed 1977 4001 in faded white, as well as a FG 4000 with normal wear. I might like to change my 4001 to a 5 string since it has a fair number of finish imperfections and I have replaced the neck pup with a Seymour Duncan SRB1-N. I had also replaced ALL of the wiring since it was pretty much trashed by the previous owner, so there is no vintage sacrilege involved. Anyone with info please reply, & many thanks in advance."
------------------------------------------------

I still haven't got around to the 4-2-5 conversion, but I am still planning on it & getting closer.

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:10 pm
by beatlefreak
Some interesting first posts listed.

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:15 pm
by kcole4001
The vast majority of my first 100 were probably questions!

Thanks again to all those who answered.

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 4:01 pm
by jwr2
Kevin ... my new workshop is up and running ...

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:31 pm
by wmthor
Although there are probably a few earlier posts, I found that on 12/16/00, I replied to the following question:
$1000.00 for a Lefty Ric 1997 with t... Is that a good deal? What do you think?


My reply was: I paid a little more than that a year ago for a new old stock 1997 LH MG (two pickups).

Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:25 am
by kcole4001
Thanks, Jeff!
I'm still in a 'negative cash flow' situation, but when the time comes I'll let you know.