1964!

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

Just a side note: I wasn't singling anyone out, it's merely my opinion that, in a perfect world (which we have the closest example on this forum), it's nice to be gentlemanly about these things.
No offence intended, Elys, or anyone else!
Image

Now, back to our previously scheduled ogling!
Plus five minus five!
User avatar
lyle_from_minneapolis
Advanced Member
Posts: 2530
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:13 pm

Post by lyle_from_minneapolis »

I'm curious about the tuners. Do they really resemble the originals? Did closed-back Grovers come and go in later years?
Here is where I hide my music:
http://www.soundclick.com/MarkKaufman
User avatar
xsubs
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 5:22 am

Post by xsubs »

The tuner shape and design is very similar. The differences are: originals would be "reverse" wind; originals were nickel plated not chrome; all screws on the originals would have been regular instead of phillips; and the "Rickenbacker" name was not stamped on the body.
The C64 tuners would have been better, as they are almost identical in every way.
Rickenbacker '64 & '68 4001 basses ♦ Fender Pre-CBS J & P Basses and 1968 Telecaster Bass ♦ Moog Taurus III Bass Pedals ♦ Hiwatt (Hylight) Amplification
"A good bassist determines the direction of any band."- Ron Carter
User avatar
lyle_from_minneapolis
Advanced Member
Posts: 2530
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:13 pm

Post by lyle_from_minneapolis »

Thanks Sean.

Wish the exploding Grovers never happened...it would be easier to re-fit my '72 with the same screwholes... ah, well.
Here is where I hide my music:
http://www.soundclick.com/MarkKaufman
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by aceonbass »

Vince, after you add this bass to your collection, I would like to buy the reissue RIC tuners from you if you don't need them please.
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Post by simer4001 »

The seller hasn't given me an address of where I can see the bass. He said today at the earliest. We'll see.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
brycycle
Advanced Member
Posts: 1774
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:03 pm

Post by brycycle »

Vincent, nice to see you posting on the forum.

i'm sure your first-hand experience/expertise will prove to be very helpful in regards to instruments such as this one.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

O.T. again!
I have not seen a lefty 60’s 4000/4001 for sale, in a collection, on stage or in any book. I did see a 60’s 4005 that was a left-handed model. I never inspected that 4005 in person so I cannot be sure it was original but the photos I was sent made it appear correct.


Peter Levett has a lefty '60s 4005. He came here to get it from the villainous Chicago Music exchange.

Image

Okay, back to your regularly scheduled program. Image
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

Kevin, none taken! Image

Mark, the switch from the reverse nickel Klusons mostly used in the 60s to the Grovers was done for a variety of reasons, and for the longest they were a really superior tuner, but when the quality of Grovers plummeted after they moved production from the USA to "Somewhere In Asia" in the middish 70s, John Hall said he dropped them like a hot potato.

On the bright side, just re-swage the pins on loose Grovers and they will work as good as new - no need to change them out. Except for pros who change strings every day or every week for a long time, or the occasional abuse case, I have never seen a set wear out. I have done a little extra swaging to all my vintage Grovers at one time or another just to make sure they are tight -usually at the same time I do the first truss rod scrapedown, polish, and shrinkwrap on a new acquisition.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
vincent_gallo
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:54 am

Post by vincent_gallo »

Dear Dane, i just pulled a set of reissue RIC tuners from a 63 bass. They are like new and a gift to you. Where should I send them ?
User avatar
elysrand
Advanced Member
Posts: 2757
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 am

Post by elysrand »

That is a genuinely nice thing to do for a fellow Forumite, Vince! Well done sir, and my hat's off to you Image I will pull a couple of pins out in your honour tonight (serious grin of friendship)
Image

And if you ever need a set of tuners pulled out of one of my 63s, you are welcome to them, Vince!
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, and sit in with the band whenever you can, to keep your chops up!
gray

Post by gray »

That is very nice, indeed! My hat's off as well!
herk
New member
Posts: 42
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:44 am

Post by herk »

so nice
User avatar
bob_atherton
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:47 am

Post by bob_atherton »

Why is everyone being so nice....?
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by chucksimms »

OK, Jeff, I have to ask: why is Chicago Music Exchange so villanious? I desperately want one of the guitars they have listed but I think it's a little (perhaps even a lot) overpriced.
'66 365 O.S. FG, '66 335 FG, '68 375 O.S., '66 330/12 MG, '69 365 O.S. azureglo, 2007 4001C64
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”