Page 4 of 6
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:16 pm
by johnhall
The sad thing is how totally irrelevant this entire thread is in the context of current events.
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:23 pm
by captsandwich
Oh, I hate it when you come in here and make cryptic comments. Now I'm going to lose several nights sleep pondering what you meant by that. You are an evil, evil man, John Hall.

Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:16 pm
by jingle_jangle
When you guys finally see what this is all about, you'll all be saying how good and fine a man John is...
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:35 pm
by antipodean
Full-width inlays all round?
A factory edition of the 4001V68?
A Ric in every home?
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:30 am
by heinpete
Paul, please put only the nice "full-width-yellow-sparkling-crushed-pearl-inlays" into the fingerboard of my 4001, she deserves it!

Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:54 pm
by pacealot
Any new Rick with factory crushed MOP would be an earth-shattering revelation for me and instantly become the focus of my eternal longing and lusting after until I finally get one. Let's hope it's a 4001V68 (or even earlier)!!
(I'd live more than happily ever after with a V68 - just change the pickguard and surround and possibly the treble p/u and make a V64-67!)
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 4:19 pm
by heinpete
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:18 pm
by sloop_john_b
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:30 pm
by pacealot
Sounds like Peter wants a V72!
(And not a Telefunken preamp either....)
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 2:30 am
by dean712
johnhall wrote:The sad thing is how totally irrelevant this entire thread is in the context of current events.
I've learned a lot from this thread. I think what makes this Forum special is the honest exchange of information - it helps those of us who are just musicians appreciate the special features of our deluxe Rickenbacker instruments. I had no idea how the inlays were cut and poured before tonight. I wouldn't have guessed that it was done the way it is done. Now, when I look at my 4003's, I have a better knowledge base.
I am curious about your reference to current events... I'll look forward to hearing more soon, I'm sure.
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:30 am
by sloop_john_b
dean712 wrote:I am curious about your reference to current events... I'll look forward to hearing more soon, I'm sure.
Dean, check out the recent threads on the new full-width inlays.

Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:56 am
by cheyenne
Wow. I had no idea how deep the old FWMOP inlays were. Now I can fully understand the "weak neck" theory. Thanks for those pics Paul.
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:47 am
by markbass99
What's cool about this latest development is all the possibilities for deluxe model 400X reissues that "could" happen now that the inlays problem has been solved. They could do a reissue all the way back to the early 60's with a horse shoe pickup.
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:06 pm
by Top Gun
The new 360’s & 4003 basses from RIC are being produced with full inlays (from binding to binding). The material looks different from what RIC was producing from the mid 70's to the present. It almost looks like one piece of mother-of-pearl??? But never the less, they are back to making full inlays…
Good job RIC... Finally, it's about time!
Question for John Hall... Will these new inlays be added to the C series guitars?
Re: Current Fingerboard Inlay material?
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:11 pm
by deaconblues
Ben informed us in another thread that poured inlays will remain on the C-series for accuracy.