Re: Bending shoes
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:46 pm
Tis' a shame, isn't it?johnallg wrote:I will try and get a good closeup of both basses shoes. My photographic skills have all but disappeared with digital......
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
Tis' a shame, isn't it?johnallg wrote:I will try and get a good closeup of both basses shoes. My photographic skills have all but disappeared with digital......
Two different cameras and I have major focusing problems. Hey, here's a question for you. I just inherited a Nikon 8008 with a 50mm and 35-about 80 zoom Nikor AF(?) lenses. Will these lenses work with the new Nikon digitals, like the D40, D60, or D80 bodies? I haven't had time to look the outfit over to be more specific.jps wrote:Tis' a shame, isn't it?johnallg wrote:I will try and get a good closeup of both basses shoes. My photographic skills have all but disappeared with digital......
Thanks Jeffrey. I accidentally called you by your last name earlier - whoops. Thanks to your advice, I love my Rick even more (if that were possible). It worked perfectly and the result was just what I needed to balance it (and make it look a little more accurate in appearance - the whole idea/purpose of the RI shoes in the first place).jps wrote:Nice job, Steven!
johnallg wrote:
Has anyone else ever wondered why the tax form is 1040 and working 40 hours a week for 52 weeks is 2080 hours?
No, it just means they only want half of what you made...jingle_jangle wrote:johnallg wrote:
Has anyone else ever wondered why the tax form is 1040 and working 40 hours a week for 52 weeks is 2080 hours?
OMG! Are you trying to say that I should have filed two of them to cover the whole year???







