Star Wars was in '77...Return (nee Revenge) of the Jedi was '83 (yes, I have a fiancee...she's bought me a Ric). Now back to your original programming...jingle_jangle wrote:Fender does, every single day of the week. Teles, Strats, Jazzmasters, Jaguars, Jazz Basses, Precision Basses, and about two hundred other odd models. But the ones I've quoted are the originals and classics. But they have not had an original blockbuster for nearly a half-century. I often find myself wishing for a design-driven business plan, but, like most companies in the last third of the 20th century, they let the marketing guys rule the roost. The result is a lack of respect for the musician as performer, creative thinker and doer who needs tools with function and style. This has been replaced by lowest-common-denominator scrambling for the deep pocket non-musician who wants "limited edition" bragging rights at any cost, regardless of lack of intrinsic value for money spent.marc61 wrote:Fender, we get it. You can make guitars. However, can you make it original ,beautiful, playable, and without costing an arm and a leg?
In 1977, when I watched the press kits for "Revenge of the Jedi" (yeah, I know they changed the title later...) flood into our design department at Playskool, as licensing began to get a foothold in what had previously been the milieu of creativity and original ideas, I began to see the writing on the wall--licenses would someday supplant unique concepts in business.
Little did I know how ridiculous it would become. Imagine if all that time and energy went into creating truly original products, instead of this woefully overpriced ****.
Oh, and I agree that it would be great to see a return to the utility of Leo's factory when the focus was on what the musicians needed and it was tested by the musicians like Dick Dale. The high priced signature editions are not something that I'm greatly in favor of, despite owning a few that were gifts. I'll take standard editions anyday to get close to my heroes.
Also, I was a marketing major for a long time and all you have to do is spend time doing pitches on what will sell based on a cost/demand basis, using readily available parts for construction, instead of developing anything new where startup costs are involved. I suspect that this will be the case for a while yet as the economy is not encouraging much risk in building new product and it's safer to stick to a holding pattern.
