330 vs. 360v64

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6979
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by collin »

paologregorio wrote:
scotty wrote:Paul thanks for you output. :twisted:


affect-effect
This is the example that always pushes my buttons. People that can't figure out the difference between a noun/subject and a verb.

As in, you can suffer the EFFECT----if you let it AFFECT you. Simple, right?




OP, on behalf of the entire RRF.....sorry for the insane thread drift!
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by winston »

Thanks for the English lesson Collin. Somewhere in the distant past....................oh yeah (sorry I lost my concentration for a moment) this thread was about guitars. :D
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by chucksimms »

Yes, but 'effect' has also now become a verb, e.g. "We hope to effect change though our new policies". To me it's one of those errors that becomes acceptable due to chronic use. 'Appropos' is one that is often used incorrectly as well; it is not synonomous with 'appropriate' but a lot of people use it that way. It gets on my *****, almost as much as the incorrect employment of 'you're' and 'it's'.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37337
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by jps »

Something that bugs me is when a person says: "My 'xxxx' needs fixed!" What happened to: "My 'xxxx' needs to be repaired"! :evil:
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6979
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by collin »

chucksimms wrote:Yes, but 'effect' has also now become a verb, e.g. "We hope to effect change though our new policies"'.
Well, in that sentence, the actual operating verb of the main verb phrase is "hope," not "effect," because the action, "hope" directly follows the subject, "We." (enough commas for ya, Paul? !) But that is beside the point. :lol:

The rules of prescriptive grammar are arbitrary. Therefore, "incorrect" grammar can become "correct" grammar when enough people agree that it is "correct." This can often happen by people refusing (or neglecting) to point out the changes.

Anyways.....now that this has become a good contender for "Weirdest Ric Thread Ever," buy one of these--you will be thank yourself later!:


Image
Last edited by collin on Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by kiramdear »

I'm happy and proud to have been a part of this distinguished and, now, award-nominated thread. Another RRF milestone under my belt. Wow! :mrgreen:
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by deaconblues »

chucksimms wrote:Yes, but 'effect' has also now become a verb, e.g. "We hope to effect change though our new policies". To me it's one of those errors that becomes acceptable due to chronic use. 'Appropos' is one that is often used incorrectly as well; it is not synonomous with 'appropriate' but a lot of people use it that way. It gets on my *****, almost as much as the incorrect employment of 'you're' and 'it's'.
Another one is 'moot,' which used to mean the exact opposite of how it's used.

1. open to discussion or debate; debatable; doubtful: a moot point.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by jingle_jangle »

Two more: Buying something off somebody, and "itching" as in, "can somebody itch my back (my daughter uses this one).

The itch is the sensation; the scratch is the relief.

Has anyone noticed the loss of double consonants in words like "labeled" (used to be "labelled")?
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by jimk »

collin wrote:
... buy one of these--you will be thank yourself later!:


Image
Actually, that's rather an Old English construction. "You will be thank yourself later" should read "You will bethank yourself later." :mrgreen:

JimK
nukebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 6:21 pm

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by nukebass »

I hate it when people use "they" as a neuter singular pronoun. I also don't like people using the female pronoun as the neuter. This is pretty common in baby material (look at the back of a Gerber jar the next time you're in a store).


I have wondered how close a 330/12 with Toaster pickups would mimic the sound of a vintage 360 (v64 or c63). For me, I don't think the cost of the reissues is justified. I'm looking far out into the future and things may change, but I imagine a 330/12 would and make me happy. I do hope to have the chance to test both instruments one day, though! :mrgreen:
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by paologregorio »

collin wrote: Anyways.....now that this has become a good contender for "Weirdest Ric Thread Ever," buy one of these--you will be thank yourself later!:


Image
+1!!! :D
pacealot
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:47 am

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by pacealot »

How about "elusion," "allusion," and "illusion"? It seems like every time I see variants of either of the first two, it's being misused where the third should be.

Oh, and I gots me one of them geetar thangies y'all 'r talkin' 'bout. Good 'un.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by paologregorio »

pacealot wrote:How about "elusion," "allusion," and "illusion"? It seems like every time I see variants of either of the first two, it's being misused where the third should be.

Oh, and I gots me one of them geetar thangies y'all 'r talkin' 'bout. Good 'un.
Which one? Is your "geetar thangie" a 330, or a 360v64?
pacealot
Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:47 am

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by pacealot »

That'd be the V64, sorry! I was in such a rush to help the thread drift right into the iceberg that I failed to specify....
xpitt
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 7:38 pm

Re: 330 vs. 360v64

Post by xpitt »

Thank you guys for this thread ! You really helped me along with english grammar, just great for a german ! :wink: After reading all four pages with increasing interest :lol: I will go down to the basement right now and caress my 360V64/12 :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”