Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

libratune wrote:Where's the hair?

Daughtry001.JPG

Where's the originality?

DOUBLEUman wrote:

JakeK wrote:

Danotron wrote:For your consideration, I present.....Motley Crew

I was gonna mention them! It brings me to a story. I had an Economics teacher from 2006-2008, whom I was very close friends with and confided in with on a regular basis, who was a fan of them growing up, probably still is. He is also a big Beatles and Who fan, so we can't hate him for that, can we?

That's Motley CRUE. And don't forget the umlauts. (Sorry, my inner metalhead must speak up ).

I stand corrected about the spelling, should have known that. I blame my spell checker. My vote for the hair stands.

You want umlats? Okay.

¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ Is this enough, for now?

I know it was a statement but....


It just shows that they were punker than I'll ever be.

-------
Re: later styles (Flock of Seagulls guy used to be a hairdresser -- not proud that I know that)
Extreme 80s hair was just awful, in so many ways, as John Stamos is seemingly a master narrative for style (and that is never good). Pretty much all rock styles can be seen as variations of his hair, either 'rockier' or 'wavier' etc. (not proud of that concept, either).

Don't forget Adam Ant!

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/m3fe14TcC5I&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/m3fe14TcC5I&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

This must get an honourable mention, for bad hair cuts and and over use of "The new wave"

Warning! You may need a Rennie for you stomach and a toothbrush to clean out your ears......

Eden.

weemac wrote:This must get an honourable mention, for bad hair cuts and and over use of "The new wave"

Warning! You may need a Rennie for you stomach and a toothbrush to clean out your ears......

I love Phil Oakley -- I guess my stomach must be made of iron. You have to admit those Human League women were, erm, not awful to look at.

DOUBLEUman wrote: You have to admit those Human League women were, erm, not awful to look at.

Fair enough, thats true!

Eden.

Oh man...Tony, you pulled the Tubes video? Boy, it's like Branson, Missouri around here sometimes...

Ah well, as Eenie Meanie used to sing: "I don't care, I don't care..."

This guy isn't technically a "Band," but I think he deserves an honorable mention:

rickaddict wrote:This guy isn't technically a "Band," but I think he deserves an honorable mention:

I won't comment on him -- we all know he has guns and a temper.

wayang wrote:Oh man...Tony, you pulled the Tubes video? Boy, it's like Branson, Missouri around here sometimes...

Ah well, as Eenie Meanie used to sing: "I don't care, I don't care..."

Sorry Dane, I did give it a LOT of thought....and I TRY to keep a LIGHT hand on my editing....but I had to.

Tony, I'm just givin' you some friendly grief...do whatch gotta do, brother!

I suppose I should have anticipated the controversy and just posted a 'still'...ladies and gentlemen...Mr. Quay Lewd!

here ya go, eh ? get bored watching this production.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bsnlo27bH0Q


and then the finished vid...but a very dark contrast copy hard too see stuff. the typical story of a band signing a record contract, (in blood) then they change your image for the worst. in your changed image, you yurn for the way it used to be and you revolt and go back to the way it was when it made you happy(and poor ! )

enjoy ! (or barf !)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_Y6ZTQc ... L&index=95

did you like our '80's roger daltry hair doos ?

OF course, it was all work and no play, eh?

Do you still have the Spector?