Page 4 of 6

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:51 am
by electrofaro
jingle_jangle wrote:Werner, did your birthday have anything to do with the change of release date on this fabulous, game-changing product?

Jus' askin'... :mrgreen:
It was on my ex' birthday, so it must be the latest trick she's pulling me! :lol:

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:59 am
by ajish4
WOOF!
Nice video....
What a waste of bandwidth! :lol:

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:41 pm
by rickenbrother
cassius987 wrote:Did I only see a truncated presentation or was that the most boring, uninformative thing ever?
Yes!
Good thing we just watched it on a vid. Imagine being there expecting to see a cool presentation.

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:02 pm
by sloop_john_b

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:54 pm
by Danotron
Thanks John, now it makes more sense to me (although I still think it's ugly :shock: ).

So, it a guitar with a built in effects processor, including delay loops and everything. Am I correct?

I guess it eliminates the need for pedals. Seems similar to the line 6 Variax with more stuff.

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:10 pm
by Grey
Danotron wrote:I guess it eliminates the need for pedals. Seems similar to the line 6 Variax with more stuff.
Except that the guitar comes with two pedals to control it.

Image

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:38 pm
by robbo63
Though I don't care for the bulging upper horn, I personally am not so revolted by the looks. But after hearing that demo, I am underwhelmed.

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:27 am
by winston
One of our local kids has played better sounding riffs than that thing manages and he only has a cheapo $200.00 Squier guitar and a couple of $60.00 pedals to go along with his 10 watt practise amp. :roll:

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:49 am
by gibsonlp
I think I need to change my username now :shock:

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 2:35 am
by kiramdear
Esthetically awful. I love the Firebird, prefer the reverse but still, it's a classic design. They managed to make it ugly now. Ugly control layout. Ugly tuner thingie. The inlays clash badly with the fret board wood. The head is garish. :( Also, I'd rather have my effects separate, thank you. Here you're stuck with these forever.

If I try to say something nice, I like the neck heel and the piezo. That's about it.

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:13 am
by weemac
The corvus, The RD, The Moderne, The Nighthawk, The MIII...
The Firebird X is just following in the tradition of....

Gibson always hold their best cards back (because they want you to pay a custom shop price for that) And it now seems that they want you pay a premium for their latest mistakes as well...

emac.

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:41 am
by rickenbrother
Maybe the Thunderbird X bass guitar will generate lightning?

Let me know when Gibson makes a guitar and bass guitar that carries it's owners gear to gigs and rehearsals and sets it up. I might be interested.

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:59 pm
by jch
Wait until ya see the acoustic version of this! :roll:

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:28 pm
by johneek
That's just really sad.....

Re: The Salvation of Gibson

Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:28 pm
by elreydlp
Henry should have just smashed his head. It would have been a LOT more interesting and probably would have been the "Salvation on Gibson"!