Page 4 of 4

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:30 pm
by jingle_jangle
Wait a minnit...

Your brain only has TWO sides? :twisted: 8) :shock: :mrgreen:

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:26 pm
by electrofaro
Sure, with the advent of 3D tv it's retro to be two-sided again :lol:

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:22 pm
by tnelson
I like the look of it on a round body 360, maybe with out the pg?

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:05 pm
by Ivan3000
How about you just find a way to put in a bound f-hole, or no hole at all some how (Like the 325C58) that would make it different.
Or maybe give the knobs the configuration of a 360F ('68 I think) have no pickguard, and have 2 Cats eye, or F sound holes.
I would make one, but my MS paint skills are very poor! :P :lol:

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:19 am
by Kees
Wildberry wrote:Anyway, I still wanted to make a version with a smaller, elevated scratchplate. I kept the general shape, only made it to about 2/3 of what the current size is. This allows for much better knobs positioning, imo. Maybe I should try to see if I can photoshop a translucent one?
1__39702_zoom.jpg

I would place the 5 knobs on the headstock and a third soundhole on the back.

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:42 pm
by electrofaro
IvanMunoz wrote:How about you just find a way to put in a bound f-hole, or no hole at all some how (Like the 325C58) that would make it different.
Or maybe give the knobs the configuration of a 360F ('68 I think) have no pickguard, and have 2 Cats eye, or F sound holes.
I would make one, but my MS paint skills are very poor! :P :lol:
All closed wouldn't look that great on a 360, imo. I don't like the f-hole shape at all on a 360, it just doesn't fit the modern shape. There are some versions above with two cat eyes, btw! With 360F you mean the 2nd, 60s version with knobs all along the bottom? I tried it, but it didn't look okay to me... I prefer the 1st, 50s 360F over the 2nd one anyway, just because of the knobs, scratchplate and elongated hole - all three just don't do it for me. Anyway, I'm no master of photoshop either, you know - just give it a try Ivan!
Kees wrote:I would place the 5 knobs on the headstock and a third soundhole on the back.
It's not a Gibson :twisted:

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 5:00 pm
by watton_earth
Wildberry wrote:Anyway, I still wanted to make a version with a smaller, elevated scratchplate. I kept the general shape, only made it to about 2/3 of what the current size is. This allows for much better knobs positioning, imo. Maybe I should try to see if I can photoshop a translucent one?
1__39702_zoom.jpg
This looks awesome! Any chance you could bash out a 4005 version in photoshop for me to salivate over?

BTWa clear scratch plate looks sweet...

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:23 pm
by jwilli
jingle_jangle wrote:We're keeping the model a secret until it emerges from its cocoon... :wink:
How's it coming, Paul? :D

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 12:58 pm
by electrofaro
Yeah, he should stop teasing us, and provide a little glimpse 8)

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:14 pm
by jingle_jangle
The teasing is in your minds, Werner, both of them... :lol:

The somewhat complex painting process began last weekend. We've got some unusual concepts worked out for this one, but I think it'll be worth the wait, and it has been a long wait especially for JWilli, as the original concept became obsolete before it could be completed.

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 1:41 pm
by electrofaro
jingle_jangle wrote:The teasing is in your minds, Werner, both of them... :lol:
Oi, we had already forgotten about that part of the thread :wink: :P

Sounds interesting! It must be horrible to wait for it! :shock:

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:02 pm
by jingle_jangle
I never said nyaaah nyaaaah, you both will recall. :twisted:

Re: Two soundholes?

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2011 2:33 pm
by electrofaro
lol :lol: