Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

No, sorry Captain B, she's considerably more than the model being discussed here! One of the first with the hi-gain, and that's one of the reason's it's still all completely original.

When you actually think about it, a '68 with an original hi-gain and a '69 with an original horseshoe are about as rare as you can get from this period.

Andrew,

A beauty, for sure!! I know you have indicated you may be selling her but I have not seen any sale post. Have you listed her anywhere?? Not that i can afford her but I'm very curious and infatuated by her beauty!!

Sepp

wints wrote:No, sorry Captain B, she's considerably more than the model being discussed here! One of the first with the hi-gain, and that's one of the reason's it's still all completely original.

When you actually think about it, a '68 with an original hi-gain and a '69 with an original horseshoe are about as rare as you can get from this period.

Well, there goes my Florida trip Did you see that additional '68 FG that Ron picked up not long ago? Another near mint example.

Them cover girls can be expensive!

bassduke49 wrote:Them cover girls can be expensive!

Bookcoverweb.jpg

Ah yes, I know....oh you mean the guitar! I wondered who owned that one! Did Ron's '67 make it in there? ( I don't have the book with me at present). How have you been Paul?

Captain Bob wrote:Did Ron's '67 make it in there? ( I don't have the book with me at present). How have you been Paul?

Um, Ron who? Don't think so. I think the '67 I show in the spread on pp. 30-31 is Tony Matura's. But ownerships change over the years, and that's why I attribute many of the photos to the contributors and photographers, not necessarily the owners.

Oh, and I've been well!

Paul, I was referring to Mr. O'Keefe! Glad you are well.

Thanks, Robert. There are several "Ron's," so I didn't know who you were referring to. I did use plenty of shots from Ron O'Keefe though; let's say he was "instrumental" in the successful illustration of some of the rarer models and colors!

Always loved the S basses, a players instrument, nice round edges to the front, neck feels more solid without inserts, simple on output, the gigging version of the 4003 !

vax2002 wrote:Always loved the S basses, a players instrument, nice round edges to the front, neck feels more solid without inserts, simple on output, the gigging version of the 4003 !

I agree. I love the look of all the goodies on the old deluxe 4001's, but given the choice, I'd be playing an "S".

teeder wrote:

vax2002 wrote:Always loved the S basses, a players instrument, nice round edges to the front, neck feels more solid without inserts, simple on output, the gigging version of the 4003 !

I agree. I love the look of all the goodies on the old deluxe 4001's, but given the choice, I'd be playing an "S".

SWEET lookin' bass!!!!!! Is that an actual vintage 4001s???? Or is it a V63 with a tug-bar???

I'd be looking for one of these, but at the price GC is charging for them, I will try to find a 4001v63, to replace the two I was forced so sell back in 2008
In the meantime, I'm looking at a 4003 MG....

SWEET lookin' bass!!!!!! Is that an actual vintage 4001s???? Or is it a V63 with a tug-bar???

'67 RM1999

teeder wrote:

SWEET lookin' bass!!!!!! Is that an actual vintage 4001s???? Or is it a V63 with a tug-bar???

'67 RM1999

NICE!!!! You are VERY lucky to have THE Holy Grail of RIC basses!!!!!

Thanks! It is a special bass.