Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

I would save up as much as it takes to get a brand new mapleglo v63 . . . or a checkerbound jetglo 4001. But the unbound, walnut-winged mapleglo 4001v63 is still my dream . . . once I have some cash to spare.

I'm new to RIC's. What is the big deal w/ those 4001v63's? I mean, I see the cosmetic things about it, etc, but I really don't care all that much for them looks wise. I prefer bound bodies. I'm sure they are great though.

j

I like both the deluxe and plain models. The V63 is simple and elegant. No frills, nothing extra - only what you need to make some thunder. The VR horseshoe is very strong and loud. It can be played without the shoes as they are non-magnetic but I leave mine on just the same. I was amazed the first time I played one. They are really excellent basses.

I think the V63 is the finest example of Rickenbacker design.

I'm a recent owner of a v63.The sound and feel from the v63 is amazing, and the lack of binding actually makes it a little more comfortable to play.

I still love the look and feel of my 4003, but as Ted and Scott say the v63 is an excellent example of a Rickenbacker bass at its finest. The power, ring and sustain has to be felt to be appreciated.

If you get a chance Jason give a v63 a try, I think you'd enjoy it.

Now, if there was a "v63-deluxe" version, (engage daydream mode) it'd be Fireglo of course, with chequered binding, and full MOP inlays, I'd be there like a rodent up an aqueduct.

The Special looks faster & sleaker. I wouldn't say more 'elegant' as Ted said.

If anything, the Deluxe looks more elegant, it's a poser, its features beam out at you.

I don't prefer one over the other, they're different things.

The Deluxe is a smart Ric in uniform, full top and tails. The Special is a Ric dressed for a good night out.

Good analogy, huh?

give me binding and triangle inlays ... that is what a 4001/4003 should have ...







and for clean lines and simple elegance the 4004 wins ...

I prefer the V63. I guess that's why they make both of them.

Who am I kidding, Deluxe rules.

Now M/G a 67 "S"...The new project,



What they look like finished...


The contour and unbound body and fingerboard make for easier playing imo...

But the deluxe,s do look the business, no doubt about it...


If you look hard enough, you can find big dots AND binding. Too cool...


It,s all good....

Now M/G a 67 "S"...The new project,



What they look like finished...


The contour and unbound body and fingerboard make for easier playing imo...

But the deluxe,s do look the business, no doubt about it...


If you look hard enough, you can find big dots AND binding. Too cool...


It,s all good....

Somehow that double posted. Hopefully Peter can edit the second....

I love my V63. The sound, looks, and playability (spell?) are great. My bandmates were giving me funny looks at practice Sunday as I was just standing there grinning as I was playing. I love this thing!

I played my '65 Jazz for about 15 years and was very happy with it until this little blonde showed up.


I'm afraid the Jazz might have to go up for sale if a V68 was offered.

I'd be very interested in seeing the response from Mr. Hall, also.

Personally, I'm only interested in owning the real McCoys - I.e the vintage originals.

I'd rather wait and save up a large kitty and plough it into something old and spectacular

I wouldn't think twice about buying an old, beat up 67' 4001S like Wints', above. A V, C or any other reissue doesn't quite cut it. Real Vintage or Bust.

And damnit, I like that RM1999 so much. You finished restoring (?) the green monster RM1999 yet, Wints?