Page 5 of 6

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:00 pm
by jwr2
I was half kidding and half serious ...

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 2:13 pm
by teb
These are a couple of concept drawings I did when I was initially thinking about buying the 2030 and trying to build a new body for it. As you can see, I was still thinking toasters and conventional wiring at that point. I still may eventually trade-in the TRC for a gold one, make another set of pickguards and buy some oven knobs, but it's always nice when the finished product winds-up bearing a reasonable resemblance to the plan. Maybe I'll drop these in Mr. Hall's suggestion box, if there's any room left in it. ImageImage

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:02 pm
by jwr2
those are both beautiful ... damn ... Ric should mass produce those ... with the 4005 shape and the 2030 electronics and pickups and neck ... that bass could sell for under $1000 ... they could reuse many 2030 parts ... I would buy one ...

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 3:50 pm
by teb
As long as we're dreaming, my dream bass would be built like a mainline instrument, not a 2000 series - stereo-wired, toasters, neck-through solid body, autumn-glow, gold guards and TRC, oven knobs and a bound top and headstock. The 4001/4003 body and headstock are probably the most distinctive in the industry, but I lean toward something a little more understated and classic. This bass wouldn't be any more complex to build than any other Ric bass (except for binding the headstock) but it's just plain elegant. Oh well, it's always nice to dream.

Image

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:00 pm
by jwr2
then it would cost over $1000 ... probably over $2000 ... and then somebody would want it hollow body ... hmmm ... $3000 or more ...

the 4002 had a bound headstock ...

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:11 pm
by jwr2
Todd ... that bass is even prettier than the 4005 ...

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:37 pm
by ken_swearingen
It would look really cool with an f hole.

Posted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:40 pm
by teb
Sure, it would be a mainline product and just as expensive as any other, but it would be nice for those of us who have always wanted to see a more subtle solid body bass shape that's still obviously a Rickenbacker. When your production is already booked up more than a year in advance making top-of-the-line products, it generally doesn't make sense to pull people off the line to also make a lower-priced selection, even if they're excellent products themselves. So I would doubt that the Hamburg-style will ever fly again unless Rickenbacker opens a production facility offshore (gag). Look at the mess that Fender has created. You have to find out where a guitar was made to tell whether it's worth $200 or $2,000. It is fun though to sit around and try to nail down one's ultimate fantasy Rickenbacker. I'm lucky in that I can draw them quickly on the computer and get a pretty good idea what they would actually look like (though it makes them seem even more attainable and just makes you want them more). Maybe I should put out a coloring book for Ricoholics so that they can plan out their dream guitars.

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 4:12 am
by jwr2
Todd: I would like to put pics of your designs on my web site ... and the one that you built ...

www.3dentourage.com/425

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:39 pm
by teb
I changed my mind. As long as I can't have it anyway - I want this one...
Image

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:51 pm
by rickaddict
They just keep getting cooler, Todd. And I like Rootbeerburst for COY 2006!

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:58 pm
by ken_swearingen
Yea ,i want that one too

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:02 pm
by los_sentidos
Now make it hollow bodied I tell you!!!

ImageImageImage

Tis looking cool. What dya reckon Mr Hall, dya like em? BTW AT the SoCalCon did Mr Hall say which his favourite basses, guitars, colours were? (Sorry if this has been posted somewhere!)

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:40 am
by ricosound
Hey where's Ted lately? I can't believe he wouldn't chime in on all this repair/upgrade talk.

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2005 9:36 am
by ken_swearingen
Good question.