Page 5 of 5

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:57 pm
by rickenbrother
"4002??? Who would want one of them."

ME!!!!!

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:56 pm
by wayang
"I have need for a 4080/12 in particular..."
Image

Gee whiz, Jon, where were ya (and yer big bag o' money) last spring?

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:33 am
by dswp
Ahh, Dane, You still don't have that do you?
Where did it go, does someone on the forum have it??? If so, where do they live??

Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:07 pm
by jon
Thanks for the welcome Mark.

Dane, it pains me every time I think of your doubleneck. I was looking around, but hadn't quite stuck that much away at the time. I've even had my drummer phoning up a few weeks ago to say he'd found one, only to discover it was an old reference to yours. Did I read on another forum that yours went to someone in a Rush tribute? If you still had it, I'd buy it instantly!

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:00 am
by wayang
Jon...it pains me every time I think of it, too...then again, it was getting to the point where it pained me every time I put it on, so perhaps it's all for the best...

The guy who bought it isn't a forum member...plays in a Rush tribute up in Kent, Washington. I'll try to get the name of the band for anyone up there who might want to check them out...or, at least, to check out 'the axe'...

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:41 pm
by aceonbass
I can certainly understand having to have an original Ricky 4080 for collectability purposes, but if something like that is needed as a "player" then might I suggest something like this as an alternative....Image

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:07 pm
by rickfan60
Does the guitar have a bass tailpiece Dane?

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:10 pm
by jon
Please tell me more...

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:24 pm
by rickcrazy
That's one of the craziest (in a good way), coolest custom jobs I've ever seen, Dane.
Ted: In the above picture think I can make out a standard Rick 6-string bridge seating on the cavity originally meant for a standard 4003 4 or 5 saddle block. Right, Dane?

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:34 pm
by aceonbass
Ted, the guitar neck does use a bass tailpiece but the bridge cavity was heavily modified to accept an Ed Roman chrome plated brass bridge that I picked up cheap on Ebay. In retrospect, a stock RIC guitar bridge, after slight modification, would have been a much easier fit. This instrument was actually made using two heavily modified RIC 3000 basses but similar results could be had using a 4003 and a 620.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:08 pm
by jon
I thought it might have been something like that. I'm just not sure I could bring myself to pay UK prices for those, & cut them up (not to mention the cost of someone joining them up). Then again, would probably still be cheaper than a 4080.

I cannot deny there is a little bit of the collector in me too.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:16 pm
by ken_swearingen
Dane,which halves of the 4003-620 are you talking about? with the bass on the bottom? otherwise the 620 only has one horn on the top??

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:45 pm
by aceonbass
Well I would put the bass on the top. If you wanted the 620 on top,in order for it to balance better, you'd need to graft the 4003's upper horn onto it. At that point a transparent finish of any kind would be out. With the 4003 on top and a properly shaped pickguard, a transparent finish would work.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 6:15 pm
by bobcat
That's such a gorgeous bass. I think that those would sell like crazy if Ric made them . . . I know I'd buy one.