I played this 1996Re C64

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

I'm looking for the one that says 'John S.' in the cavity... Image
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

OK, Glen. You win. I saw only one at NAMM. Perhaps there was a spare.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

Thanks Atsushi and Glen.

FYI, The smaller box is the original RIC shipping carton. I believe it was marked 1/2 at the factory because it matches the other markings on the box and I have other RIC shipping boxes marked like this. I think it indicates the number of units shipped to a dealer at one time. The larger box is there because I asked the dealer to "double-box" the guitar for it's trip to me.

BTW, RIC uses FedEx now to ship guitars to their dealers.
ben_hall
RIC
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:16 pm

Post by ben_hall »

Yes, there were two 1996's made before NAMM and one was slated to go but I switched them at the last second for some reason I don't recall right now.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

Looks great. I can't wait!
This is off the record
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

Thanks Ben, that's interesting news.

Is there anything else you can tell us about the two 1996 models that were made before NAMM. Were these done as "prototypes" or were they the first two of a regular production run?
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

Is it possible for an after the fact/exacting reissue to ever be considered a "prototype?"
This is off the record
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Hmm. I will say yes, although you could call them different things to get to the same conclusion; 'sample', 'design study', 'pre-production model' etc...

I know what you're saying Glenn, I tend to think of the very first attempt as the prototype myself..
ben_hall
RIC
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:16 pm

Post by ben_hall »

Prototypes of these were made well before these two were built.
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

Ben, so was the 1996 shown at the Yokohama Music Fair last year a prototype?

Since it had a 20 degree (1 o'clock) f hole and Mr. Hall stated earlier in this thread: "FYI, the shipments to Japan this next year will have 30 degree (aka 2 o'clock) -F- holes, not like this one." I have a feeling that it probably was.
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

I found another post in a different thread by Mr. Hall that answers my question.

Posted on Monday, November 28, 2005 - 02:11 pm:

"The correct designation for this guitar is Model 1996, after the Rose Morris model number. The rest of the production units have the 31 degree soundhole, unlike the prototype shown above. ("2 o'clock -F- hole" is a horribly inaccurate term.)"

"The Japanese chose to have some of the 325C64's they had coming to be delivered as this sub-model variation as they appear to be more cognizant in Japan of the John Lennon connection to this model."
User avatar
wj350
Advanced Member
Posts: 1675
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:00 am

Post by wj350 »

I just sent Gary at NCM my deposit for one of the new 1996s--thought it would be the perfect companion to the 325c58, although of course the perfect trio would include a c64. I thought the 1996 was unique enough to explore that one next...
"Let me take you down...'cause I'm going to...."
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

Bill: As soon as I get a minute, I'm going to send a deposit to NCM for a 1996. Any idea how many are in line right now? I'm prepared to wait a few years, but it will be worth it.
User avatar
glen_l
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:43 pm
Contact:

Post by glen_l »

If I was ordering one I'd probably go for the 1996 too. The 325C64 resembles the V63 whereas the 1996 is a cool and previously almost unavailable reissue.

Perhaps the 1996 at the Yokohama Music Fair last year wasn't one of the new reissues. It could have been one of the reissues made in the year 1996 ordered into the Japanese market. Unlike the the new ones, they did have 1 o'clock soundholes.
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

Glen, I believe the 1996 at the Yokohama Music Fair had the same type bracing as the new 1996 reissues and the original 1996 models. This was reported by Atsushi Yoshida, who saw it in person and thought it was X bracing. As shown earlier in this thread, I also have one of the Fireglo 325V63 f hole (20 degree) models produced in 1996 and it is not made like that. I believe that some of the ones made in 1996 had 31 degree f holes as well. Someone here sent me a photo of one once.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”