Real Love vs. Free as a Bird

The history and music of the Fab Four
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Electric Light Orchestra = ELO
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
glass_onion
Junior Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 5:06 pm

Post by glass_onion »

George Harrison liked the black crows?
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Post by beatlefreak »

George seemed to like a lot of things that we never knew until the later years - like his fondness for ukeleles.

And I don't think there was anything wrong with ELO. Their later stuff did tend to be almost a parody of itself, but a lot of their earlier material was great.
Ka is a wheel.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

ELO is definitely one band where you either love them or hate them.

I don't know anyone who's in between on 'em.

Any missed called on FAAB, etc., though are also the Fabs fault. They were there, too.
This is off the record
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Post by shamustwin »

Though I like both, FAAB seems dirge like, and a bit depressing. Maybe cause it came out first, and the John from the Grave thing was a bit shocking to me.
User avatar
expomick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 12:40 pm
Contact:

Post by expomick »

I'm moved to go listen to some old ELO...kiddies?

(my sincere apologies for that last line)
How much!?!
lennonon
Member
Posts: 209
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 6:09 am

Post by lennonon »

I was having a laugh y'know. I (unfortuntely) know who ELO is. Good point about the remaining three being just as responsible for these tracks. Even better point about the mistakes the former fabs made in choosing producers after 1970. I mean, if you listen only to John Lennon's back catalogue you would think Phil Specter was some neophyte producer who didn't have a clue.

John makes repeated references to working with someone who "loved" him on Plastic Ono Band, about how Phil and Yoko enabled him to reach such depths of despair and passion. If so, to me, that's the best thing Specter ever did in his career. His "production" of Plastic Ono band works only because it's quite clearly LENNON'S vision at work on this album - Specter is just executing that "stripped down" "minimalist" "urgent" sound that JL so prized.

In fact, most of - or all - of SPecters work with John is a sonic mess. I think it speaks volumes about a producer when the RAW tracks (the R-N-R trackes on the Lennon box) are SOOOOOO much better than the finished product. One listens to the raw tracks for John's rendition of Rip It Up/Ready teddy and you wonder - how could anyone muck this up? He sounds so raw and so fired up...the album version is a "piece of ice cream cake" as John once said (referrring to the blue album mix of Revolution).

I know Lennon did most of the production himself on R-N-R after Specter flipped, but clearly he had completely lost his vision on what a good rock-n-roll record should sound like. Probably picked up some nastly habits from Specter.

Maybe they should have had Phil produce FAAB...?
cowboy_joe
New member
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 7:37 am

Post by cowboy_joe »

As much as I love John Lennon as an artist, at times I do not love his production, or his choice of producers.

I think Spector's early stuff was outstanding, To Know Him is to Love Him and such, are great. And then we get The Long and Winding Road, and you wonder what happened. Then again, Lennon was the sole producer for the Mind Games album, and that doesn't sound especially good either, so who knows.

Back to FAAB, I would have liked to have heard what Nick Lowe could do on it--I like everything he's worked on.
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Post by shamustwin »

I so agree...John Lennon's demos sound better to me than the finished versions.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

Speaking of which, where's Spector now? I've heard little of the trial save a photo of his and his outrageous hairstyle in court (someone I know remarked "he should get life without parole for that hair alone!)

Spector's talent was his initial success; selecting and sometimes writing tunes, recruiting performers, and holding the sessions.

His mixes, on the other hand, were unfortunately highly influential by the mid 60s (love that Capitol added reverb on Fabs tracks, not to mention Pet Sounds?)
This is off the record
User avatar
beatlefreak
Senior Member
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 am
Contact:

Post by beatlefreak »

Glenn wrote:
"Speaking of which, where's Spector now?"

Probably trying to figure out who to kill next.
Ka is a wheel.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

He had a pretty tragic childhood. In that sense, it's kind of ironic that he and Lennon are locked into history.

I wonder if he'd have been any less weird had he not been in show biz.
This is off the record
Post Reply

Return to “Beatles' Forum”