Page 5 of 8
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:18 am
by prog_rockin_metal_man
I guess it's just me then...I must be more used to seeing grovers.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:27 am
by johnallg
Matt - you did notice the cracked CV on the headstock and scratched up back of the bass? Not to disparage the bass, but I would not call that awesome. But also remember, the late 70's have nice thin necks.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:38 am
by kcole4001
The price is starting to get up there now, too.
It was around $500-600 when I posted it.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:48 am
by kcole4001
And it's gone up another $200! $1130 US, or $1284 Cdn.
For that price I'd buy a new 4003. It's got nothing going for it except that it's a 4001.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:51 am
by kcole4001
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:59 am
by kcole4001
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:49 pm
by j_gary
Ummmm....just thinking out loud here.
Is there a musical reason to pay more for an old 4001 than a new 4003 or 4004?
I like the look of the old girl, but I'd much rather have a new mapleglo.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:19 pm
by kcole4001
Some folks do prefer a 4001 to a 4003, & some even certain years.
I have no such preference, I'd go with a brand spankin' new 4003 for the same money, but then I've never had the pleasure of playing an early '70's 4001 (or even earlier than that).
Jeff Rath says the late '60's basses had a great resonance that's lacking in later ones.
All three of mine ('76, '77, & '81) have a different sound & feel.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:11 pm
by ben_brown
Some things just get better with age I suppose...
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:13 pm
by johnallg
"Some things just get better with age I suppose..."
I keep telling my wife that! So far it's working....

Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 6:44 am
by prog_rockin_metal_man
yeah looks like that jetglo is going to go out of my price range (damn border fees)...I don't know what some people are thinking when it comes to run of the mill 4001's...did anyone see that white/BT 78' that had a BIN of +3000$ Canadian (2700$ US?) I thought that was pretty ridiculous.
I've made up my mind I'm getting Jim Glen's bass. It will have to satisfy my Rick needs for now but I can always get nicer ones in the future. I know that one won't be enough.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 11:30 am
by kcole4001
True, you'll want another soon.
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:37 am
by prog_rockin_metal_man
well I'm commited...I sent the money to Jim. Now I play the waiting game. I can hardly wait!!!
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 8:37 am
by johnallg
Hey, congrats! Pics when it comes!
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:03 am
by prog_rockin_metal_man
thanks john...I don't have a digital camera but I'll get someone to take some pics for me...I know a fellow forumite that frequents the guitar section, his name is Pat Magee...we went to the same high school and we both go to the same university...we're gonna jam once I get my bass...he has a '79 burgandyglo 360 (I think, I'm not very familiar with rick guitars...it has three pickups) and we might try and put together a blues band.