Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

That has to be one of the silliest things Gibson has ever done!

jps wrote:That has to be one of the silliest things Gibson has ever done!

Oh, I dunno, it looks like it would come in handy here in the harbor. They say everything on a boat has to serve at least two purposes.

kiramdear wrote:

jps wrote:That has to be one of the silliest things Gibson has ever done!

Oh, I dunno, it looks like it would come in handy here in the harbor. They say everything on a boat has to serve at least two purposes.

Hey, if you thought the regular Flying V was uncomformtable to play, check this bad boy out!

kiramdear wrote:

jps wrote:That has to be one of the silliest things Gibson has ever done!

Oh, I dunno, it looks like it would come in handy here in the harbor. They say everything on a boat has to serve at least two purposes.

I don't know, as a boat anchor, I'm not sure it would be all that effective...

jps wrote:

beefandbones wrote:Yeah, same modern body as the 4003, but with toaster, horseshoe and 1/2" spacing.

Something like this, maybe?

That's one super nice Jetglo. Love that pickguard!!! It really adds to the overall visual appeal.

I would not be suprised if the C series replacement bass was not something like this. Perhaps with the checkerboard binding even???? I would be interested in a bass along these lines.

cheyenne wrote:Discontinuing a model thats not moving very well and concentrating on the backlog makes sense. We all would like them to make everything available all the time, but thats not very likely is it ?

Concentrating on the backlog for now, keeping QC tight, and maybe a new design / designs for when this depression, ( yes, I said depression) might pick up, makes sense to me.

I've been wondering about that, too, 'acourse, although I'm not sure in these difficult times, and as the C64 seemingly hasn't been selling all too well already before anyway, I would recommend anything but offering a TT + HS ("full VP") option for the 4003, as this apparently to many players would be highly attractive.

Likewise, a slight modification I could still recommend was a series/parallel switch, either on a push/pull pot, or by replaying the 3-way w/ a 4-way rotary PU-select (neck only, both serial, both parallel, bridge only).

Of course, what I would like to play still more than a C64 was some real fancy stuff based on the 4000Ci-ii, 4002, and then still some, like a stabilized neck of 3 pcs of maple + 2 pcs of bubinga, ebony fretboard (maybe even w/ paua oval inlays), claro walnut body wings + matching headstock overlay (preferedly w/ a maximally protecting high gloss finish); some state-of-the-art hardware (preferedly gold): Hipshot Ultralite tuners, Hipshot A bridge (brass) w/ thru-body-stringing option; some decent extended range PUs (maybe even SCs + dummy coil), a 5-way rotary PU-select (N, S, P, B, standby), 2 vol, 2 tone, ¼" + XLR outputs.

cassius987 wrote:...Okay, no jokes about how much birds suck compared to dinosaurs please!! I set myself up for that one...

My dinosaur can kick your bird's butt. Birds suck.

johnallg wrote:

ricosound wrote:

paul_yan wrote:...living together in perfect harmony...

...not!!!!!!

He got his answer from years ago - When I'm 64.

Ha! Just saw your post, Bobcat!

Shouldn't that be "When I'm c64"?

Robert states:

Shouldn't that be "When I'm c64"?

It's very hard to resist a c64 joke when a C=128 is so near and handy.

I know we're talking C-Series replacement but I'm seriously getting used to my 4003S/5 now and would be very very tempted to have another 5er but fretless with no fret lines or dots.

I guess the best option for me would be to just get another 5er and replace the fretboard.

1965 wrote:

aceonbass wrote:Maybe Ben meant they were going to flip the body this time.

That's funny looking!

Paul, I just saw these in the Gibson outlet store in Nashville and they look worse in person...

Heike wrote: like a stabilized neck of 3 pcs of maple + 2 pcs of bubinga, ebony fretboard (maybe even w/ paua oval inlays), claro walnut body wings + matching headstock overlay (preferedly w/ a maximally protecting high gloss finish); some state-of-the-art hardware (preferedly gold): Hipshot Ultralite tuners, Hipshot A bridge (brass) w/ thru-body-stringing option; some decent extended range PUs (maybe even SCs + dummy coil), a 5-way rotary PU-select (N, S, P, B, standby), 2 vol, 2 tone, ¼" + XLR outputs.

You don't want a Rick, you want an Alembic

aceonbass wrote:You don't want a Rick, you want an Alembic

Otherwise, don't let yourself be mislead by such an incomplete feature list (which about equally well could be said to overlap with e.g. that of some of Tobias, Marleaux or Sandberg basses). The typical (and variations thereof) RIC sound IMSNHO is largely determined by the selection of woods and how the are composed. Experience obviously has shown that you can slam on a heavier bridge such as a BadAss II or Hipshot/brass, or also Bartolini PUs (or even think of that 70s mudbucker), and still it will sound like more of like a RIC than anything else.

OTOH, I'm not sure even if Alembic could be coaxed into building a maple NT, 33¼" scale, bubinga fretboard, 1¼" thick solid maple body wings w/ sort of a simplified RIC-inspired shape (again think e.g. Sandberg), alone their hardware will make a difference, not to speak of their PUs and electronics (no matter their 2-band EQ or low-pass filter w/ Q).

johnallg wrote:Paul, I just saw these in the Gibson outlet store in Nashville and they look worse in person...

OMG, I didn't know that thing was REAL!!! I thought Wes was just making a joke via photoshop. Jeez, they're real! Holy smoke and a pancake!! http://www.gibson.com/Promotions/ReverseFlyingV/

Well, at least if one's playing a show outdoors with one, a stand is completely unnecessary; the end will sink easily into the nearest spot of dirt shovel/spade style.