merit to "washer trick"?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
^^^
huahuahua sorry but i'm out of a decent drawing application ...
huahuahua sorry but i'm out of a decent drawing application ...
- coolhandjjl
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
Damn...why do I read these forums.... Looked at my '09 4003, and it is lifted up a tad.
Something else for me to disassemble and wreck.
Something else for me to disassemble and wreck.
'09 4003 | '93 4003s
John Luke aka Coolhand
John Luke aka Coolhand
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
You have a funny laugh, Mattia!cangaroo wrote:
huahuahua ...
I once worked with a guy from Mexico that laughed like this:
Ja ja ja!
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
sounds cool .... please show some photos if you can ... i need so bad to improve the e string ...jamespaul71 wrote:just wanted to post that I tried this out andit helped the sound of the e string in a massive way, it seems to vibrate a lot better now. I don't know if it is the result of more contact or if by random chance the bridge moved just a microscopic bit and it corrected something but it seems to make a big difference in the tone. If others have tried it and found no difference then it sounds like this is a case-by-case tweak per the instrument. Very cool tweak
-
jamespaul71
- Junior Member
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:51 pm
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
no need, I just got a few thin washers and kept stacking them around the 3 screws until they no longer moved when I shook the bass.cangaroo wrote:sounds cool .... please show some photos if you can ... i need so bad to improve the e string ...jamespaul71 wrote:just wanted to post that I tried this out andit helped the sound of the e string in a massive way, it seems to vibrate a lot better now. I don't know if it is the result of more contact or if by random chance the bridge moved just a microscopic bit and it corrected something but it seems to make a big difference in the tone. If others have tried it and found no difference then it sounds like this is a case-by-case tweak per the instrument. Very cool tweak
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
A tad?? I wouldn't worry about that. My V63 us up about 3/16" and I'm not correcting that.coolhandjjl wrote:Damn...why do I read these forums.... Looked at my '09 4003, and it is lifted up a tad.
Something else for me to disassemble and wreck.
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
Thanks for the tips. I had another go and tried to get it so it didn't rock at all. I definitely had the lift at the back completely straightened out. This time it hardly lifted at all when I put the strings back on. Perhaps just 1/2 a credit card whereas it started at 1 1/2 credit cards. I think the thing I did differently this time was to not to overtighten the 3 screws under the bridge. Even though the coins are tight under there I think the downward pressure still encourages the tail upwards. I'm not going to do any more. It sounds fine and I don't want to weaken the tailpiece. I'd hate to have to replace it through overzealous tinkering...T.A.R. wrote:
Antonius, I experienced the same thing the first time. That was when I found that the area around the back two screws was making contact with the body before the outside edges of the tailpiece. After straightening that out, reassembled and only just tightened the screws, I didn't bear down hard on them. I tried the fit several times looking for "high spots" rocking the piece. When it didn't rock I screwed it in place trying not to over tighten any of the screws.
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
very smart !!jamespaul71 wrote:no need, I just got a few thin washers and kept stacking them around the 3 screws until they no longer moved when I shook the bass.
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
I'm happy things worked out. Thanks to the forum, being able to get so many opinions, ideas and solutions adds to the experience
. Between Joeys Bassnotes and Teds anatomy section and the forums willingness to help I'm more confident in my ability to do what's right for my bass. Now if I can learn how to play 
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
Very cool, Ted. Rick on!
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
Yes this is a great forum and the help and advice I get here and from places like Joey's Bassnotes have proved invaluable on many occasions. 
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
So...Tonewise,is it better to use metal washers or a thin shaped piece of wood...if it's wood,what's the best to use?
...and on the 8th day,God created Rickenbacker.
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
Oh goody, now we can start a whole new debate alongs the lines of:Paolo wrote:So...Tonewise,is it better to use metal washers or a thin shaped piece of wood...if it's wood,what's the best to use?
tubes vs. solidstate
flatwounds vs. roundwounds
P vs. J
analog vs. digital
film vs. pixels
Cool, this should be fun!!!
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
jps wrote:Oh goody, now we can start a whole new debate alongs the lines of:Paolo wrote:So...Tonewise,is it better to use metal washers or a thin shaped piece of wood...if it's wood,what's the best to use?
tubes vs. solidstate
flatwounds vs. roundwounds
P vs. J
analog vs. digital
film vs. pixels
Cool, this should be fun!!!![]()
![]()
I feel a headache coming on!!
...and on the 8th day,God created Rickenbacker.
Re: merit to "washer trick"?
No debate here, it should be obvious the best material would be a block of sintered unobtanium...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
