Page 5 of 6

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:09 pm
by bluewhale
It looks like Tom Petty plays a 4001C64 FG in Mudcrutch videos like above.

Did he use it on the recordings?

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:55 am
by paologregorio
Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.

381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:20 pm
by rikk
ricnbacker wrote:
ilan wrote:The Mustang was used on the Fireball LP. Smoke on the Water (and the rest of Machine Head) was recorded with the Ric before it was modded. Pictures of Home is the neck toaster soloed, not two J pickups.

yes, thanks for the info....

what did he use on made in Japan?
He used the Rick for Made in Japan through the end of his time with Purple in the 70's. Not sure when he modded it. My guess is sometime in '72.

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:41 pm
by rickenbrother
paologregorio wrote:Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.

381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.
+1!

That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:15 pm
by cjj
rickenbrother wrote:
paologregorio wrote:Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.

381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.
+1!

That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.
Great idea! I'd have to buy one!
8)


But...

No Jetglo?????
:shock:

Hey Tony! I think he's finally coming around! Talking about pretty wood and no mention of Jetglo at all!
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:40 pm
by rickenbrother
cjj wrote:
rickenbrother wrote:
paologregorio wrote:Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.

381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.
+1!

That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.
Great idea! I'd have to buy one!
8)
But...

No Jetglo?????
:shock:

Hey Tony! I think he's finally coming around! Talking about pretty wood and no mention of Jetglo at all!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
:roll: Oh c'mon, you know I have Jetglo very well covered already! 8)

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:42 pm
by JakeK
cjj wrote:But...

No Jetglo?????
:shock:

Hey Tony! I think he's finally coming around! Talking about pretty wood and no mention of Jetglo at all!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Like the McGuinn, Petty and Wilson guitar models, JG is for less figured wood.

BTW, Joey, even I'd take bass playing seriously if the 4004JV was announced! Maybe you could do like McGuinn and do an instructional video 8) :mrgreen:

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:51 pm
by bosco64
rickenbrother wrote:
That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.
Joey, I would buy one of those in Trans Green, or maybe White Pearl in a heartbeat! :mrgreen:

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:24 pm
by Fuzzy Thoughts
rickenbrother wrote:That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding
Sounds almost like a Lemmy without the carvings?...

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:01 pm
by rickenbrother
Fuzzy Thoughts wrote:
rickenbrother wrote:That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding
Sounds almost like a Lemmy without the carvings?...
Yes, similar, but I'd want the usual maple body wings for a finish of my choice. Full width inlays instead of the stars, unless the fingerboard wood of choice looked amazing, then I'd rather have dots, to see more of the wood. The LK did not have the 4003 bridge or keywinds.
I'm also think that a nice dark trans orange would look great on this dream model.

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:06 pm
by cjj
Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.

Ooh, here's a thought. How about putting a flamed maple board on that 4004JV?
8) 8) 8)

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:08 pm
by jps
cjj wrote:Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.
Or. no dots at all.

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:13 pm
by rickenbrother
jps wrote:
cjj wrote:Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.
Or. no dots at all.
Nah, too Hobbit looking, takes away the RIC vibe.
cjj wrote:Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.

Ooh, here's a thought. How about putting a flamed maple board on that 4004JV?
8) 8) 8)
Could be an option. Harder to see the light colored inlays on lighter wood. Now we'd need a new inlay color. Might look too Rickenfaker. I like dark fingerboard woods, always did.

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:13 pm
by Fuzzy Thoughts
Or... inlays out of a different nice wood...

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 2:19 pm
by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
here's more of entwistle's 4008..