Re: The Signature bass (that never was)
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:09 pm
It looks like Tom Petty plays a 4001C64 FG in Mudcrutch videos like above.
Did he use it on the recordings?
Did he use it on the recordings?
Rickenbacker Forum, Amplifier, Bass and Guitar Register
https://www.rickresource.com/forum/
He used the Rick for Made in Japan through the end of his time with Purple in the 70's. Not sure when he modded it. My guess is sometime in '72.ricnbacker wrote:ilan wrote:The Mustang was used on the Fireball LP. Smoke on the Water (and the rest of Machine Head) was recorded with the Ric before it was modded. Pictures of Home is the neck toaster soloed, not two J pickups.
yes, thanks for the info....
what did he use on made in Japan?
+1!paologregorio wrote:Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.
381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.
Great idea! I'd have to buy one!rickenbrother wrote:+1!paologregorio wrote:Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.
381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.
That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.
cjj wrote:Great idea! I'd have to buy one!rickenbrother wrote:+1!paologregorio wrote:Joey Vasco Signature model dream Rick bass; the 4381JV.
381 body, 4 strings, guitar style headstock.
That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.
![]()
But...
No Jetglo?????
Hey Tony! I think he's finally coming around! Talking about pretty wood and no mention of Jetglo at all!
![]()
![]()
Like the McGuinn, Petty and Wilson guitar models, JG is for less figured wood.cjj wrote:But...
No Jetglo?????
Hey Tony! I think he's finally coming around! Talking about pretty wood and no mention of Jetglo at all!
![]()
![]()
Joey, I would buy one of those in Trans Green, or maybe White Pearl in a heartbeat!rickenbrother wrote:
That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding, one of Eric B's amazing new Fireglo finishes that has the slight amber hue in the center or maybe Montezuma Brown over some pretty wood, standard RIC 4003 tailpiece and standard 4003 keywinds. Available in 4 and 5 string versions as well as fretless of both.
Sounds almost like a Lemmy without the carvings?...rickenbrother wrote:That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding
Yes, similar, but I'd want the usual maple body wings for a finish of my choice. Full width inlays instead of the stars, unless the fingerboard wood of choice looked amazing, then I'd rather have dots, to see more of the wood. The LK did not have the 4003 bridge or keywinds.Fuzzy Thoughts wrote:Sounds almost like a Lemmy without the carvings?...rickenbrother wrote:That and a 4004jv, which the appointments would be; 4003 body wings, no pickguard, control cavity routed in the back, 3 pickups mounted to the front like a 4004 (extra pickup right before the bridge), checkered binding
Or. no dots at all.cjj wrote:Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.
Nah, too Hobbit looking, takes away the RIC vibe.jps wrote:Or. no dots at all.cjj wrote:Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.
Could be an option. Harder to see the light colored inlays on lighter wood. Now we'd need a new inlay color. Might look too Rickenfaker. I like dark fingerboard woods, always did.cjj wrote:Yeah, I have to agree on the dots vs. triangle inlays. I love the inlays, but on pretty wood, dots show more.
Ooh, here's a thought. How about putting a flamed maple board on that 4004JV?
![]()
![]()