merit to "washer trick"?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rokkitt
Junior Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:03 pm

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by rokkitt »

hahaha

unobtanium


ya, I just did my ric bridge on 88 4003

will post some pics

used two dimes on each side of the screws....

three screws across..... so.... screw dimes screw dimes screw get it?


the E still seems dead a little, but the A string pounds and rings tru!

also, put DR hi beams on as well....the E string sounds like a piano!

will try the "drill the bridge adjusters" next



so, my ric is worth 40 cents more!

allen
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by cassius987 »

rokkitt wrote:the E still seems dead a little, but the A string pounds and rings tru!

also, put DR hi beams on as well....the E string sounds like a piano!
I guess there's a bit of a happy medium with those larger strings like B and E, because if the string is too small it won't have enough tension to ring as true as the other strings, but if there's too much mass it won't generate enough energy to sustain as well. So be careful, some but not all makes of .105'' strings suffer from the latter condition, I have found, although D'A Nickel XLs don't in my experience.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by johnallg »

cassius987 wrote:
rokkitt wrote:the E still seems dead a little, but the A string pounds and rings tru!

also, put DR hi beams on as well....the E string sounds like a piano!
I guess there's a bit of a happy medium with those larger strings like B and E, because if the string is too small it won't have enough tension to ring as true as the other strings, but if there's too much mass it won't generate enough energy to sustain as well. So be careful, some but not all makes of .105'' strings suffer from the latter condition, I have found, although D'A Nickel XLs don't in my experience.
When I was using D'Adarrio strings I did not have the low volume problem on the E or any string.
User avatar
mikko
Junior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:40 am
Contact:

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by mikko »

Maybe I got it all wrong but if this “washer trick” makes the bass so much better, why they don´t do it already at the RIC factory? Also, if tailpiece can´t handle the tension of the strings then there is a serious design mistake that should have been corrected already? Or what´s this all about? This all gives me an image of semi-finished product.
Don´t mean to argue or anything, I´m just curious since I haven´t had any problems with my 4003.
User avatar
colin
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by colin »

mikko wrote:Maybe I got it all wrong but if this “washer trick” makes the bass so much better, why they don´t do it already at the RIC factory? Also, if tailpiece can´t handle the tension of the strings then there is a serious design mistake that should have been corrected already? Or what´s this all about? This all gives me an image of semi-finished product.
Don´t mean to argue or anything, I´m just curious since I haven´t had any problems with my 4003.
+1

I don't get it either. And doesn't the result look a bit odd?
jamespaul71
Junior Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:51 pm

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by jamespaul71 »

It could just be that shifting things a little bit helps sometimes, could be string related etc. If it facilitates the improvement of the setup for whatever reason, and is reversible, then who cares really :D
User avatar
T.A.R.
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:39 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by T.A.R. »

I maybe wrong but I believe they prevent over tightening the three screws(closest to the pup). It seems once they have been it facilitates the bending of the tailpiece. I would imagine that it is different for the different generations of tailpiece mine is a '74.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by rickaddict »

In extensive testing, I have discovered the following: My Ricks that have no washers under the tailpiece sound fantastic. Putting washers under the tail also results in them sounding fantastic. When my Ricks have up to 1/4 inch of tail lift, they sound fantastic. But when they have absolutely no tail lift...they also sound fantastic. My Ricks that have a 7-screw tailpiece sound fantastic. And my Rick that has a gap-toothed, aluminum 3-screw tailpiece sounds...(you guessed it!) fantastic.

In conclusion, I recommend that all Rick bass owners play their instrument rather than obsess over it.

8)
User avatar
T.A.R.
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:39 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by T.A.R. »

Good advice :)
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by cassius987 »

rickaddict wrote:In extensive testing, I have discovered the following: My Ricks that have no washers under the tailpiece sound fantastic. Putting washers under the tail also results in them sounding fantastic. When my Ricks have up to 1/4 inch of tail lift, they sound fantastic. But when they have absolutely no tail lift...they also sound fantastic. My Ricks that have a 7-screw tailpiece sound fantastic. And my Rick that has a gap-toothed, aluminum 3-screw tailpiece sounds...(you guessed it!) fantastic.

In conclusion, I recommend that all Rick bass owners play their instrument rather than obsess over it.

8)
Jeff that was great. Thanks for that.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13196
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by rickenbrother »

rickaddict wrote:In conclusion, I recommend that all Rick bass owners play their instrument rather than obsess over it.
I agree!
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
antonius
Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:15 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by antonius »

rickaddict wrote:In conclusion, I recommend that all Rick bass owners play their instrument rather than obsess over it.

8)
...or rather obsess about playing it! 8) :D
cangaroo
Junior Member
Posts: 152
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:29 pm
Contact:

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by cangaroo »

i guess this thread is for the rick ones that sounds just good and want their bass to sound fantastic
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by bassduke49 »

Go ahead, Jeff. Try not to say . . .





. . . OBSESSION!
Attachments
Blackstarcloseweb.jpg
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: merit to "washer trick"?

Post by rickaddict »

bassduke49 wrote:Go ahead, Jeff. Try not to say . . .





. . . OBSESSION!
I hear a loud...purring from deep within my person when I look at that photo.

Uh-oh...My co-workers are beginning to take notice!

Must...Look.....Away!!

8)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”