Re: Your favorite neck?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:00 pm
Ken,
On consideration, there may well be some variation on neck width, as Semie Moseley was never renowned for the consistency of his product specification. My mark 1 is '70s bass (post the Mosrite bankruptcy shake-up), but I also have played a late '60s Mosrite mash-up ('68 neck - post the Ventures endorsement deal - attached to a '90s body) and the neck shape is very similar. Oddly, the string spacing is narrow relative to the width of the neck- there is a lot of space between the outer strings and the edge of the fretboard, and there is about a 2mm gap between the edges of the neck and the edges of the metal string guide above the zero fret. There is no such gap on my '66 Ventures guitar. This suggests that earlier basses may have had a narrower neck. I'd love to get my hands on an earlier model to see if there was a major change in width.
On consideration, there may well be some variation on neck width, as Semie Moseley was never renowned for the consistency of his product specification. My mark 1 is '70s bass (post the Mosrite bankruptcy shake-up), but I also have played a late '60s Mosrite mash-up ('68 neck - post the Ventures endorsement deal - attached to a '90s body) and the neck shape is very similar. Oddly, the string spacing is narrow relative to the width of the neck- there is a lot of space between the outer strings and the edge of the fretboard, and there is about a 2mm gap between the edges of the neck and the edges of the metal string guide above the zero fret. There is no such gap on my '66 Ventures guitar. This suggests that earlier basses may have had a narrower neck. I'd love to get my hands on an earlier model to see if there was a major change in width.